They won't do that.....companies would move their operations then.
Not all of them. Not those with good old-fashioned morals.
They won't do that.....companies would move their operations then.
Not all of them. Not those with good old-fashioned morals.
the rest of society pays for medical cost? this was before the reform?
so what's the difference with this reform? the society is paying for it too.
Morals? Please. It's business. Business says if you are not making money you make changes that allow you to make money.....Pretty simple. And there is nothing immoral about it unless the business is immoral to begin with.
I am surprised outsourcing still takes place in today's economic reality. I suspect it will be reined in soon enough, though.
Two words, Jiro: preventive care.
I don't think that's gonna work in here as it does in Europe because our concept of economy is vastly different. We are fast. profitable. demanding. Europe? They think they've got all the time in the world.
so 2 words for you - inverse-square law. that's 2 words if I use the hyphen, right?
The problem with people in business is their reliance on mathematical exponential growth. It only works well for bacteria.
The problem with people in business is their reliance on mathematical exponential growth. It only works well for bacteria.
What makes you think the accident rate is going to go up just because coverage is mandated? That's quite a reach.
Public servants, eh? You mean perpetual chair-warmers?
Too bad the only options are "single adult" and "family of four". Neither one fits my situation.You can estimate your own subsidy by using the Kaiser subsidy calculator
No, actually it's called a hyphenated word.
The economy being different has virtually nothing to do with people thinking they have all the time in the world. That is simply a lack of maturity. But preventive care has been shown to work. People not being able to access preventive care because they have a maximum to fulfill before their insurance kicks in, or not being insured at all, is the main reason that people don't utilize preventive care services.
The split in social philosophies at the heart of Europe between libertarian 'American-style' values pursued by the UK, Ireland and many new EU states and the more welfare-orientated 'social model' maintained by many continental western European states such as France, Sweden and the Netherlands has recently come to a head over the issue of the UK's continued opt-out from the maximum working week.
The real problem about working time, however, is not the imposition of statutory upper limits, but a social framework that makes it impossible for companies to operate efficiently within these limits. Rather than preventing those who wish to work longer hours from improving their income levels, the focus for EU policymakers should be on increasing the proportion of the employed workforce that are available to carry out their jobs. This means taking a long hard look at how much employee benefits are creating a 'time off' culture and providing financial incentives to spend too much time absent from work.
Meanwhile, David Coats, Associate Director at the Work Foundation in London, told Forbes.com that productivity was rising in Europe despite the EU rules to reduce working times, which didn't mean the environment was less business friendly.
"Europeans might be working less hours but their productivity remains high. In the United States, people take the money and work longer hours, whereas in Europe people take less money and use more time for themselves. This doesn't make Europe less business friendly. These are simply choices societies make," Coats said.
I should have included an emoticon
The fight here was more about how helmet laws and seat belt laws came about. The Fed gov threatened Texas with loss of highway funds if they didn't comply with Fed guidelines. That didn't sit well with many.
That is also how our legal drinking age came to be 21. It was 18 until 1980 or so. Changed to 19 until 1986 when it became 21.
Question is whether it is right for the Federal Government to withhold funds to compel state law changes when the citizens and businesses of that state provide the government with those funds in the first place.