- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
I see...that doesn't sound too bad at all.
Neither did the stimulus that would keep unemployment below 8%
I see...that doesn't sound too bad at all.
No. Everyone will be covered by health care insurance. If someone doesn't want health care, they just don't have to go to the doctor.
I see where the confusion is coming in. Some posters were using the term "health care" when what they really meant was "insurance." Health care is what a doctor provides. Insurance is what helps to defray the cost of the health care.
It is less expensive that private coverage is now. And if you can't afford it at all, you will qualify for Medicaid. You will be covered one way or the other.
I have for 2 days in other threads....Feel free to give your predictions. I gave simple questions and I answered them.
People already qualify for medicaid - so why is it people are **required** to have health insurance?
And government regulated health insurance at that ... or face a $2,000 fine and/or imprisonment?
Quit dancing around the bush.
No. Everyone will be covered by health care insurance. If someone doesn't want health care, they just don't have to go to the doctor.
Mmm... If they want a doctor but don't want a health care, then they can't have a health care. Right?
I see where the confusion is coming in. Some posters were using the term "health care" when what they really meant was "insurance." Health care is what a doctor provides. Insurance is what helps to defray the cost of the health care.
Neither did the stimulus that would keep unemployment below 8%
Neither did the stimulus that would keep unemployment below 8%
That has been the liberal spin - does anyone know what the Republican Health Plan really is?
It does not benefit doctors, it does not benefit psychiatrists, it does not benefit health insurance companies. It benefits the people.
Obamacare does the exact opposite.
OKKKK.... Let me clear.
Jillio, are you saying if a person really needs a doctor for his or her health reason, then he/she will need to get a healthcare. If a person don't want a healthcare, yet wants a doctor, then a person can't have her or his healthcare. That would be BIG too bad for him or her. Right?
OK, *IF* he/she have a healthcare so he/she can go to see his/her doctor for his/her health reaons. So, if he/she don't pay a tax, he/she'll go to jail. Even if he/she change his/her mind that he/she don't want a healthcare or to pay a tax for the healthcare anymore, then he/she still will go to jail. Right?
I just want to understand so clear. ><;; I feel a little overwhelmed here.....
Neither did the stimulus that would keep unemployment below 8%
Neither did the stimulus that would keep unemployment below 8%
I'm so sorry but I am not sure if I get it... Care to explain it better?
EDIT: Be right back. I want to edit my profile.
not the same comparsion. It's a completly different manner.
Explain it to us, please.
Of course the current bill does exactly the opposite. It actually has provisions to keep the insurance companies in check.
Apples and oranges.
As for health insurance yes you will have to have it now. If you don't there will be a fine. If you have it now you will be able to see the same Dr as before.....as long as that Dr chooses to accept that insurance plan.
Exactly. An attempt to confuse and distract.
not the same comparsion. It's a completly different manner.
the only comparison made was......the stimulus plan sounded good, but didn't work. This plan sounds good but...........to be continued