The Highlander
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 8,235
- Reaction score
- 1
And you forgot I was a Machinist...lol
Micrometer..you can measure to 1000th of an inch, used for figuring clearances for cam/crank journals or thicknesses.
I can feel your pain with auto trans, rather just buy one rebuilt at a shop and trade a core...lol
Torque wrenches are just that, torquing bolts to lb/in, do you have a 1/4" torque wrench for in/lb?
So we are in the same boat on mechanical knowledge, I am refering to wire shorts hidden in the dash, always a pain in the arse and really never found... even had shops that never could find them, even after replacing the wire harnesses. Electrical is simple on older cars, newer cars are more complicated with all the added electronic gadgets like steering wheel controls for radio, ect...heads up display...all the more wiring.
That's pretty cool you was for machinist. NO, I don't forget. I just don't know that. Don't have 1/4" and just ft lbs only. Don't needs that for heavy duty diesel motor that I recall so far. If happen then I can borrow it from someone but rare happen. Used borrow it from someone for gasoline motor.
Yes, Electrical troubleshooting are very hard and depend on people's skill . I remember my old coworker spend 2 hours to try fixed the RGN's overload strobe. He replaced the new 7 pins plugs, switch, and some wires. He got angry and gave up then asked me to took his RO and I asked him and he told me that it got hot wire ON but no strobe on with his test light. So I used my DMM and I found that it got OPEN ground and I rewired it in 5 minutes. It was not that hard for me. OH poor him. My father taught me electrical when I was around 12 years old. He is electrical engineering for over 35 years.
I still don't understand that you HATE Japanese so much but you love Europe. Funny thing, Mostly Europe vehicles are more complex than American and Japanese for electrical even it's 80's. Mostly Europe vehicles use ETC (Electronic throttle control) since 80's. Again, USE electrical diagram so you will figure it out and take a times.
I've owned 3 of those. a 1988 Chevy Blazer, a 1989 GMC Jimmy and a 2003 Chevy Blazer which is my current truck. They tow well we used to pull a dual axle race car trailer loaded with a toyota celica stock 4 dirt track race car with the GMC Jimmy.
Yes, Blazers are best for towing because it use frame body. I remember video about Safelty crash test on Blazer from high school and Blazer can crush on the driver's foot. (OUCH!) Also teacher said it was bad body design, Not because of type of metal or years or USA/China. It was interesting.
depending on the accident, no seatbelts and airbags...how much simpler you want?
Okay, That's what I learned from college and he said unibody got crashed/fold easier than frame body as SHOULD BE. Why? Because the engine go hit on the ground OR can't push engine around. If frame body then engine can push to steering wheel easy then kill to driver or serious injury.
highlander why are ford mustangs and pintos... any early fords for that matter so damn dangerous? What was the quick fix from ford for this...NO CHEATING WITH GOOGLE.
No clue about Pintos. Because it's Ford? Probably bad body design.
My pictures are useless to you, because youre an ass.
Just drive and work on your moneymakers. Thats what it boils down to..
you are a pro in what you do, I am a pro in what I enjoy. done deal.
No jerk necessary. I just want to see a pictures about new vs old for crash. I do know about Baja, It's boxer with air-cooling. Most people swaped it with Subaru's EJ20 or EJ25 because of fuel efficient and less pollution. Did you know that air-cooling are high pollution than liquid-cooled. Plus air-cooling got overheat so easy if IDLE too long or drive too SLOW on the bad traffic but I am not SURE if Baja have fan or not. It's happen to my motorcycle with liquid-cooled.
This is Subaru EJ20.
Last edited: