Hate new cars

My dad was selling new cars at the time the US first required general publication of recalls. He said that there were not that many more but that before notices just went out to owners.
 
It's better to take it in and have it actually done professionally. The cans that you do it with yourself is not as good as how they do it in a shop, and you don't have to deal with it yourself :P
 
I admit, I do like the body styles of some new cars, but doubt if I would ever own one. I dont like any of the new mustangs, the cabin is so damn cramped, unless youre a midget then theres plenty of room. The new camaros, and some foreign cars have nice designs and roomy... guess its what anyone prefers. I wouldnt mind some, but the price tags are way over inflated.
 
Mewtilation said:
It's all about Toyota. <3
Click to expand...
It's not only Toyota. All other Japanese cars (Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi) are reliable, too. Korean cars, Hyundai and KIA are catching up.

I prefer new cars due to new technology. Old/classic cars, :barf:
 
CrazyPaul said:
It's not only Toyota. All other Japanese cars (Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi) are reliable, too. Korean cars, Hyundai and KIA are catching up.

I prefer new cars due to new technology. Old/classic cars, :barf:
Click to expand...

Make sure you dont go to any car shows so you dont get sick.
 
CrazyPaul said:
It's not only Toyota. All other Japanese cars (Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi) are reliable, too. Korean cars, Hyundai and KIA are catching up.

I prefer new cars due to new technology. Old/classic cars, :barf:
Click to expand...

I like your second phrase. :)
 
diehardbiker said:
Recalls were rare during the days of old cars. Now it seems more often recalls going on nowadays.

My old truck could have been recalled, but Ford can't afford em, AND it is impossible to fix the core problem. If had they recall my truck, I'd be more than happy to keep it. Long story on why... Engineer from either two companies (Ford and Navistar) are at blame, both pointing at each other. So, I got rid of em, and got another one that got legendary engine. The older vehicle is, the easier to tell which is truly a dependable. I no longer care about make or model, just KNOWN reliable vehicle.
Click to expand...

I've noticed that too
 
so you all just wait, a few more years they will crawl out of the wood work and say it never made a difference...believe what you want, brainwashed by the governments.
 
sonocativo said:
so you all just wait, a few more years they will crawl out of the wood work and say it never made a difference...believe what you want, brainwashed by the governments.
Click to expand...

Oh please, I'm not brainwashed by government.

We have universities and medical communities to make studies and recommendation, before they share with government. No politicians want to pass the law to regulate without studies and recommendation, but in some cases, government may ignore studies and recommendation - see relationship between FDA and GMO.
 
Foxrac said:
Oh please, I'm not brainwashed by government.

We have universities and medical communities to make studies and recommendation, before they share with government. No politicians want to pass the law to regulate without studies and recommendation, but in some cases, government may ignore studies and recommendation - see relationship between FDA and GMO.
Click to expand...

shhhh... they make money from the government to make money for the government.
 
sonocativo said:
shhhh... they make money from the government to make money for the government.
Click to expand...

That's not always true.

I took course in legal studies and I know about how government works, along with agencies, especially EPA.

You are denying that pollution is real problem, but I don't care because you are not our representative, also the court disagree with you.
 
Foxrac said:
That's not always true.

I took course in legal studies and I know about how government works, along with agencies, especially EPA.

You are denying that pollution is real problem, but I don't care because you are not our representative, also the court disagree with you.
Click to expand...

Keep telling yourself that... You took a course...woohooo
I worked for the government, do you think they actually tell all their secrets. geeeze man.
did you forget in the earlier posts I worked with air pollutions.... come on, actual experience vs the books.....
 
sonocativo said:
Keep telling yourself that... You took a course...woohooo
I worked for the government, do you think they actually tell all their secrets. geeeze man.
did you forget in the earlier posts I worked with air pollutions.... come on, actual experience vs the books.....
Click to expand...

We noticed that you put inaccurate information so some of us don't trust or not impressed with you. I already explained that catalytic converter already solved the pollution issue that caused by transportation and that why air quality today is better than in 1960s and 1970s. Pollution is real health concern, backed by medical communities and our government regulate on pollution, based on studies and statistic. Sorry, the pollution is no secret and it is serious concern, even there were a lot of citizens complained about poor air quality.

I'm not impressed with your previous job position due to inaccurate information and you injected personal view about pollution is not real.

Medical communities and court disagree with you, so I don't see any argument is really necessary.
 
Putting away can of fuel.

Ain't worth it. My experience tells me and I am on one's side. Books? Its just ahem.... whatever you wish to call em. (Walks away)
 
diehardbiker said:
Putting away can of fuel.

Ain't worth it. My experience tells me and I am on one's side. Books? Its just ahem.... whatever you wish to call em. (Walks away)
Click to expand...

No, the course in legal studies is about business and government, and explain about how government agencies, for example, EPA to regulate on pollution based on medical recommendation (research, statistic, studies) and they have meeting with businesses to make testify about whatever proposed regulation has impact on business. If you think pollution is not real then why we have EPA, pollution control and other regulation, also medical communities disagree with you, it doesn't matter if you claim that you have experience but you didn't prove to them that pollution from cars don't cause health concern or worsen the air quality, but medical communities already proved to them with years of studies, along with demand from citizens who suffered from dirty air quality in the past.

It doesn't make sense about some people denied that pollution is real problem, that's not same as climate change. Most of representatives have no problem with pollution regulation because we have solid evidence that pollution is bad, but we don't have solid evidence for climate change - that's more complicated.

I'm really don't care now because our government already fixed the pollution issue and my statement is actually from medical community, also they have solid evidence that pollution cause health problem. I'm happy that you are not our representative and there are small number of people don't believe in pollution that is real problem. ;)
 
Foxrac said:
No, the course in legal studies is about business and government, and explain about how government agencies, for example, EPA to regulate on pollution based on medical recommendation (research, statistic, studies) and they have meeting with businesses to make testify about whatever proposed regulation has impact on business. If you think pollution is not real then why we have EPA, pollution control and other regulation, also medical communities disagree with you, it doesn't matter if you claim that you have experience but you didn't prove to them that pollution from cars don't cause health concern or worsen the air quality, but medical communities already proved to them with years of studies, along with demand from citizens who suffered from dirty air quality in the past.

It doesn't make sense about some people denied that pollution is real problem, that's not same as climate change. Most of representatives have no problem with pollution regulation because we have solid evidence that pollution is bad, but we don't have solid evidence for climate change - that's more complicated.

I'm really don't care now because our government already fixed the pollution issue and my statement is actually from medical community, also they have solid evidence that pollution cause health problem. I'm happy that you are not our representative and there are small number of people don't believe in pollution that is real problem. ;)
Click to expand...

Bwaaaahahahahaha
 
Fox, bad news is, the mis info isnt from me.
Ill leave this as that... if youre still around in a few years and want to revise this then, we will see what happens... its Obamas fault now.

On a side note, with your mis-informed info... Varies State to State.
 
sonocativo said:
Bwaaaahahahahaha
Click to expand...

sonocativo said:
Fox, bad news is, the mis info isnt from me.
Ill leave this as that... if youre still around in a few years and want to revise this then, we will see what happens... its Obamas fault now.

On a side note, with your mis-informed info... Varies State to State.
Click to expand...

What's up with childish statement? It is showing me that you cannot prove that pollution from transportation doesn't harm to public health. I already explained very clearly and that's not my opinion because it is fact based on medical communities. It looks like you have difficult to understand about what I am saying and we know that you believe in conspiracy theories.

Sorry, I'm not interested to hear your conspiracy theories.

No, my statement about between pollution and public health hasn't changed because it is come from factual statement, but I'm unsure about climate change.
 
Back
Top