I experienced audism this week. I was quite offended. I had read threads about it in here but never had first hand experience. What's worse is the source was my local deaf services office. Not sure if this is typical or not. I was surprised
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5373d/5373d006ea255c3277c42c07d8b42e5f130529cb" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
I experienced audism this week. I was quite offended. I had read threads about it in here but never had first hand experience. What's worse is the source was my local deaf services office. Not sure if this is typical or not. I was surprised
All I wanted to know who is RML and his/her blog/vlog.
All I wanted to know who is RML and his/her blog/vlog.
I actually do apologize. I had him mixed up with someone else. I confused his blog with RML. I was completly in the wrong.
Ahem.... RLM does not use voice when he signs. Of course I know him in real life.
Where on earth do I say that anyone uses their voice when they sign? I confused Carl's blog with that of RLM. I was absolutly in the wrong and I am sorry. I reacted with a misstatement because I was refering to the wrong person. I was wrong to say Carl was an extremist. I am actually not very familiar with his views at all. I was 100% in the wrong. The person I believe to be an extremist, and whom I was actually refering to was RLM. He very devisive and negative towards people with CI's, even children.
Again, I was totally wrong, it was not Carl, and I apologize.
Re: Animosity
The animosity here results from certain people denying deaf people's experience. When someone denies a person's experience, it is an assault on the person's reality. It's like someone saying, "You did not exist like that." It should come as no surprise that people who have their identity called into question act negatively and defensively.
Deaf people should be able to speak of their experiences without having to defend themselves. Deaf people define their own culture.
Re: Animosity
The animosity here results from certain people denying deaf people's experience. When someone denies a person's experience, it is an assault on the person's reality. It's like someone saying, "You did not exist like that." It should come as no surprise that people who have their identity called into question act negatively and defensively.
Deaf people should be able to speak of their experiences without having to defend themselves. Deaf people define their own culture.
Where on earth do I say that anyone uses their voice when they sign? I confused Carl's blog with that of RLM. I was absolutly in the wrong and I am sorry. I reacted with a misstatement because I was refering to the wrong person. I was wrong to say Carl was an extremist. I am actually not very familiar with his views at all. I was 100% in the wrong. The person I believe to be an extremist, and whom I was actually refering to was RLM. He very devisive and negative towards people with CI's, even children.
Again, I was totally wrong, it was not Carl, and I apologize.
Re: Animosity
The animosity here results from certain people denying deaf people's experience. When someone denies a person's experience, it is an assault on the person's reality. It's like someone saying, "You did not exist like that." It should come as no surprise that people who have their identity called into question act negatively and defensively.
Deaf people should be able to speak of their experiences without having to defend themselves. Deaf people define their own culture.
That is a valid point.
I'm glad at least the animosity in this thread is cleared up. Now if only hearing people will finally realize that there is Deaf culture and finally understand and correct the forms of audism. It would be nice if Deaf culture was allowed to thrive without a constant battle for its survival.
How if a majority of hearing people keep telling us that children with CIs can hear and dont need the Deaf community nor ASL?