Hacker Gang 'Lizard Squad' Says It Has Stopped ......

My kid said its an old news . I'm not sure why he thinks it's an old news when it happened before x mas. He said its annoying! His friend was upset about it and my son was sort of calming him through FaceTime. Aww
 
Jiro said:
no we do not need another agency. FBI has several departments. all they have to do is recruit more agents and that's what they did.... Each state has its own cybercrime unit as well.

Homeland Security does not focus on terrorism. It's not an agency. It's just a cabinet department. The sole purpose of Homeland Security is to ensure a smooth, transparent communication between all agencies and to report to the President.

We have Department of Defense.... Department of State... Department of Treasury.... and now Department of Homeland Security.

DoD focuses on military/foreign side. DHS focuses on civilian/domestic side.


we have NSA to help. so yea we don't need another agency. that will just create more headache and a serious waste of resource and tax money.
Click to expand...
Oh alright, thanks for the details.
 
Hacking is the samething as Piracy. When you copy a movie from a DVD or Download and copy a song its stealing and FBI does arrest you for that.
 
The Joker said:
Hacking is the samething as Piracy. When you copy a movie from a DVD or Download and copy a song its stealing and FBI does arrest you for that.
Click to expand...

um.... nope!
 
The Joker said:
Hacking is the samething as Piracy. When you copy a movie from a DVD or Download and copy a song its stealing and FBI does arrest you for that.
Click to expand...

Most-famous-lol-face.jpg
 
Joker..... Priacy is 20 years in federal prison. Hacking? 5, at the very least. Not even close. Better look up your laws again.
 
ChicagoBlue2 said:
Joker..... Priacy is 20 years in federal prison. Hacking? 5, at the very least. Not even close. Better look up your laws again.
Click to expand...

US government rather to hire hackers instead of prosecute them.
 
CrazyPaul said:
Is that a fact? All of them?
Click to expand...

why are you always fixated with "all"? does everything has to be "all"? is it necessary to ask "all"? use your common sense. it's irrelevant and unimportant. a rule of thumb - if a person wants to specifically include "all"... then he would say so. if not, then it's not "all".

Foxrac said:
US government rather to hire hackers instead of prosecute them.
Click to expand...

Foxrac said:
US government rather to hire all hackers instead of prosecute them.
Click to expand...

anyway - what do you think why majority of hackers working for government are contractors instead of federal employees?
 
Jiro said:
why are you always fixated with "all"? does everything has to be "all"? is it necessary to ask "all"? use your common sense. it's irrelevant and unimportant. a rule of thumb - if a person wants to specifically include "all"... then he would say so. if not, then it's not "all".
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Foxrac
US government rather to hire hackers instead of prosecute them.
Click to expand...
That means all of hackers.

Originally Posted by Foxrac
US government rather to hire some hackers instead of prosecute them.
Click to expand...
That means not all of hackers.

For example, cops are pigs, that means all cops are pigs.
Some cops are pigs, that means not all cops are pigs.
 
Jiro said:
anyway - what do you think why majority of hackers working for government are contractors instead of federal employees?
Click to expand...
I don't think the majority of hackers who are hired by the government haven't yet committed the crime. The government recruited them who attended the hacker conventions. Google it.
 
CrazyPaul said:
I don't think the majority of hackers who are hired by the government haven't yet committed the crime. The government recruited them who attended the hacker conventions. Google it.
Click to expand...

why should I google it when I told you that already?

http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=2383140&postcount=13

you forget so soon??? it's called DEF CON. they host it once a year in Vegas.

but no. the answer is wrong. some hackers have criminal records. no way to get hired as federal employee. best they can do is get a contractor status.

another reasons - a lot of them would fail drug test LOL! and they don't like conformity. and some of them do not have American citizenship. and some of them do not have either high school degree or college degree... or both.
 
Jiro said:
why should I google it when I told you that already?

http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=2383140&postcount=13

you forget so soon??? it's called DEF CON. they host it once a year in Vegas.

but no. the answer is wrong. some hackers have criminal records. no way to get hired as federal employee. best they can do is get a contractor status.

another reasons - a lot of them would fail drug test LOL! and they don't like conformity. and some of them do not have American citizenship. and some of them do not have either high school degree or college degree... or both.
Click to expand...
So the government prosecutes some hackers (cybercriminals) or not? I get confused because Foxrac said the government would rather not prosecute them.

You didn't tell me already about DEF-CON. You already told the Joker about it.
 
CrazyPaul said:
So the government prosecutes some hackers (cybercriminals) or not? I get confused because Foxrac said the government would rather not prosecute them.
Click to expand...

They don't. They would much rather put their hacking skills to good use instead of putting them in jail and making them hate the US Government. Working for the US Government as a hacker is far better then sitting in federal prison, broke and having a felony record.
 
ChicagoBlue2 said:
They don't. They would much rather put their hacking skills to good use instead of putting them in jail and making them hate the US Government. Working for the US Government as a hacker is far better then sitting in federal prison, broke and having a felony record.
Click to expand...
Did you read Jiro's recent post (I already know about that via google anyway)? A lot of them who fail drug test CAN'T work for the government. So does the government let those troublemakers get away with it?
 
CrazyPaul said:
Did you read Jiro's recent post (I already know about that via google anyway)? A lot of them who fail drug test CAN'T work for the government. So does the government let those troublemakers get away with it?
Click to expand...

Yes, I do. And I'm pretty sure there are regulations they have to follow if they wish to keep working. If they fail to follow said regulations, good chance they might get deported.
 
ChicagoBlue2 said:
Yes, I do. And I'm pretty sure there are regulations they have to follow if they wish to keep working. If they fail to follow said regulations, good chance they might get deported.
Click to expand...
Why would they be deported if they are American potheads?

For example, I am a hacker who commits a cybercrime and I am an American who smokes pot, what would happen to me?
 
CrazyPaul said:
Why would they be deported if they are American potheads?
Click to expand...

If they're American, then they would be fired, and blacklisted from ever working for the US Government because of their history. No agency wants a person who has a drug history working for them. When I worked at Great Lakes, you had to be clear of drugs and alcohol, as that is an federal employment job, and being drunk/high on the job at that level has severe consequences.
 
ChicagoBlue2 said:
If they're American, then they would be fired, and blacklisted from ever working for the US Government because of their history. No agency wants a person who has a drug history working for them. When I worked at Great Lakes, you had to be clear of drugs and alcohol, as that is an federal employment job, and being drunk/high on the job at that level has severe consequences.
Click to expand...
No, I am talking about hackers who commit a cybercrime. Re-read my edited post, please.
 
Back
Top