naisho
Forum Disorders M.D.,Ph.D
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 6,433
- Reaction score
- 11
Did some photoshopping math for the rest of you guys:
From that guy on the bottom left corner, assuming he's say average guy height - 5ft8.
He's .11 inches on the screen. Measure from his head to the tip of the highest peak of that mountain, it is about 3.66 inches. convert inches to feet, and we have:
188 feet high. Note that he's not at the bottom of the incline, so judging from the housing down there he probably has like 100 feet down to go. This would mean from house to peak, its ~300 feet, give or take erronus numbers. Also the depth (z) axis is hard to tell so objects might actually be closer to us seeing the picture. We also do not know if the house is actually the ground level or not.
I'm just mathematically guessing, that the mountain in that picture is no higher than 1,000 feet high. It is entirely dependent on how far the Z axis is, to be honest.
I'll leave the googling for someone else to do..
From that guy on the bottom left corner, assuming he's say average guy height - 5ft8.
He's .11 inches on the screen. Measure from his head to the tip of the highest peak of that mountain, it is about 3.66 inches. convert inches to feet, and we have:
188 feet high. Note that he's not at the bottom of the incline, so judging from the housing down there he probably has like 100 feet down to go. This would mean from house to peak, its ~300 feet, give or take erronus numbers. Also the depth (z) axis is hard to tell so objects might actually be closer to us seeing the picture. We also do not know if the house is actually the ground level or not.
I'm just mathematically guessing, that the mountain in that picture is no higher than 1,000 feet high. It is entirely dependent on how far the Z axis is, to be honest.
I'll leave the googling for someone else to do..
