Jazzy--Two questions. If you ban guns for law-abiding citizens, and they obey it, what about the black market in guns, that criminals use to get weapons? Since this black market cannot be completely shut down (so no matter what you will do, criminals WILL still get weapons), is it fair for criminals to have weapons and law-abiding citizens to have none?
It is not for me to tell citizen they have right to own guns etc but it is wrong for anyone to cheer this people when they shot them. They are no different from bad people.
Second--only part of the fact that she didn't kill him was luck. The other part is that she was trained in how to use her weapon properly. I think gun safety and basic use courses are required in order to get a license for one.
[Police do kill innocnet people by accident even they are trained in this field. ( there was a toddler who was shot in head by the swat team early this year, they were professional and they do made mistakes when they trigged the guns) She would have servered his artery in his leg and bleed to death. I still think she has no right to shoot this thief. She would have put the alarm in her apt to scare thief away. But instead she owns a gun with intend to shoot anyone.
As to the story you told, I'd have to know [/COLOR] the answer to several questions.
--Was the thief armed? Nope, he had nothing on him.
--Did he verbally threaten the lives of the farmer and his family? Nope he was too far away from farmer's house.
--Did he physically strike out against the farmer and his family? nope he simple took the chicken out of the coop.
--Was there time for the farmer to call the police, and if so, did he do it? At that time they do not have a police esp in very small town. Some placestill do not have police in their towns-
-Did the farmer warn the thief before he fired a shot? I don't know I was not there nor anyone was there except himself and this thief.
--Was the farmer also very poor, and needed that chicken to feed his family? Not if the farmer had a land and house to live in with lot of foods to grow and so was my grandfather and his family lived next door to eachother. . My grandparents never own the guns and they would let them steal their chickens and eggs instead of shoot and kill them. Because they knew those people whom lived in the shack with no plumber or light to run. Not too far from them.
--Was the farmer's intent, when he shot, to incapacitate, or to kill? would have to say this farmer does do what everyone would do, hate the thief to protect his property. Intent to shoot with harm. I never met him but my mother knew him.
What I'm trying to determine is, was there imminent danger to the lives of the farmer and his family? And did the farmer try everything to avoid having to shoot?