VA Bowbender
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2014
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 0
He didn't kill anyone ???
Would that be the only unreasonable action???
He didn't kill anyone ???
He's suing for lost income and punitive damages. Punitive damages make sense but lost income doesn't make sense. After 30 years in law enforcement, he should be receiving retirement benefits as well as SSDI if he paid SS taxes (since he's under 62-MRA). So I don't think a court will award it except punitive damages in case he wins.
Would that be the only unreasonable action???
I really don't know what to think now but like I said I am not a gun person but in my humble opinion I think the cop should had knows better than to have his hand where is was.
Do you think because of people like this we got the expressions: shooting his mouth off or shooting himself in his own foot?
Nah, they know it's a waste of time since they wouldn't win.So following that course of logic the other patrons of the store could sue the cop for brandishing a loaded firearm. Ignorance is no excuse for the law.
It is illegal to discharge a firearm in that manner. What, would he tell the judge "I didn't know the gun was loaded"?
I don't know what you are talking about because what about a first time gun buyer who comes into a gun shop and try a gun out? Do you expect him/her to inspect the gun to make sure it's not loaded? *smh* NRA has nothing to do with it. All gun shops (retailers) must follow the law for safety reasons. The gun shop made a honest mistake. It doesn't matter whether the customer is a cop, ex-cop, gun expert or newbie as Reba mentioned. In other words, the gun shop is fu*ked up for failing to inspect a gun before it's given to a customer.
well here is a thought, is it an indoor shooting range? Here we have indoor ranges in the gun shops and you can "rent" the guns to shoot, or try before you buy... maybe someone rented it to shoot or tried out and didnt buy, returned it loaded and the clerk didnt check before putting back into the display case... one reason here they take the mags out.
There are ranges that may do that -we have a public indoor range in Massachusetts...and I think S&W in Springfield may - not sure though as they might be a range operation only. You can rent guns and try them out in the public range in my area - but those are rentals and not for sale. No dealer is going to allow people to handle a sale item. It's like saying "May I rent this Lexus and take it to work for week? I'll buy it if I like it." Fat chance they'll agree....
Can a negligent discharge happen with a rental? Yes, if the person doesn't clear the chamber and handle the gun with care. It's their responsibility to ensure the gun is empty when they return it to the counter, and it's the responsibility of the shop to verify. If you're using a range, you sign a waiver stating that you understand the danger of mishandling guns, etc., etc.
Both parties in the article share blame. This wasn't a regular Joe off the street, he's a seasoned cop....who should have known better, but he's playing the stupid card...and I'm not buying it.
I meant, a first time buyer tries an unloaded gun out at a gun shop to see if s/he likes it or not without inspecting it."Try a gun out" - where do you live? You go to a shop, you look at the firearm, they don't allow you to take it out back and try it out....at least that's so in the People's Republic of Massachusetts. Might other shops allow that? Maybe down south, who knows.... Do I expect the person handling the gun to clear the chamber....umm...yes. If you don't know anything about firearms, you don't handle it. I don't call leaving a bullet in the chamber "an honest mistake" - it's stupidity and negligence, but again, you treat a firearm as if it's loaded at all times per NRA guidance on safe gun handling. When people don't follow the golden rules of safe gun handling, bad things happen. I blame the shop for creating a potentially dangerous work environment for fellow employees and customers, and I blame the cop for being too careless to remember his years of training around firearms as someone who's supposed to have a clue. What does the NRA have to do it? Not going there....
I meant, a first time buyer tries an unloaded gun out at a gun shop to see if s/he likes it or not without inspecting it.
Anyway, the lawyer for the ex-cop pointed out that it wouldn't happen if the employee checked the gun to make sure it was unloaded before giving it to him. The employee failed to follow NRA's number 3 rule since he was the one to pick it up.
I meant, a first time buyer tries an unloaded gun out at a gun shop to see if s/he likes it or not without inspecting it.
Anyway, the lawyer for the ex-cop pointed out that it wouldn't happen if the employee checked the gun to make sure it was unloaded before giving it to him. The employee failed to follow NRA's number 3 rule since he was the one to pick it up.
I meant, a first time buyer tries an unloaded gun out at a gun shop to see if s/he likes it or not without inspecting it.
Anyway, the lawyer for the ex-cop pointed out that it wouldn't happen if the employee checked the gun to make sure it was unloaded before giving it to him. The employee failed to follow NRA's number 3 rule since he was the one to pick it up.
You see, this is about the cop who carried his gun for 30 years suing the gun shop. It's not about other gun owners who have no control over this case. The court decides, not the gun owners. Get it?It is best interest to let gunowners explain, not anyone who don't have gun or support gun control laws, especially you.