- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 8
I thought my post was pretty clear. You stated.....
So I pointed out that it was actually the Democrats that played the partisan game. They met without Republicans behind closed doors despite the fact that Obama promised on 8 occassions that the debate would be aired on C-SPAN for all to see. The met to discuss how to handle the Union's (Dem Supporters) objection to the tax on High End insurance plans.
First Dems can't use the "they do it too" defense because they ran on a platform of "Change" and "no more politics as usual". The fact that Republicans didn't go along with the Health Care bill this summer means they were doing their jobs. The public likes the idea of interstate insurance and tort reform. The Republicans were represnting their constituents. The fact that the Dem bills were very unpopular (still are) and they still tried to force it through show that the Dems are neither representing the Public nor negotiating with the Republicans.
I was in favor of bipartisanship on the Heath care thing but the Republicans made it clear they weren't interested in bipartisanhip and I doubt they'll be cooperative this time around.
So I pointed out that it was actually the Democrats that played the partisan game. They met without Republicans behind closed doors despite the fact that Obama promised on 8 occassions that the debate would be aired on C-SPAN for all to see. The met to discuss how to handle the Union's (Dem Supporters) objection to the tax on High End insurance plans.
And?
I'd say they wanted an ear from Obama regarding their concerns. I have no doubt that the Republicans leaders would have wanted to speak in private with the Republican Whip Canto or House minority leader Joe Boehner. Note the date; if they had done this last spring, you might have a stronger case. Over the summer, it became clear that the Republicans had no intention of working in a bipartisan manner. I will give Democrats credit for trying to work in a bipartisan manner long after I gave up hope.
Oh, look what I found at the top of your link: Healthcare: Obama meets with Republicans. Granted, it's an opinion blog and one that I agree on many points.
So I decided to google the meeting to get the facts; I think netrox or someone else posted about that meeting elsewhere. The ball is in their court - like it or not. If no one has posted about it, I will do so others can get all the facts. I note that Obama hasn't placed the blame entirely on the Republicans: "But on the specifics, I think both sides can take some blame for a sour climate on Capitol Hill. What I can do maybe to help is to try to bring Republican and Democratic leadership together on a more regular basis with me. That's, I think, a failure on my part, is to try to foster better communications even if there's disagreement. And I will try to see if we can do more of that this year. That's on the sort of the general issue."
First Dems can't use the "they do it too" defense because they ran on a platform of "Change" and "no more politics as usual". The fact that Republicans didn't go along with the Health Care bill this summer means they were doing their jobs. The public likes the idea of interstate insurance and tort reform. The Republicans were represnting their constituents. The fact that the Dem bills were very unpopular (still are) and they still tried to force it through show that the Dems are neither representing the Public nor negotiating with the Republicans.