web730 said:
Oh, you still don't know what you talking about after this long time. Spirit-blind and blah-blah like you think you know everything. Sorry, you don't.
Sorry, but as someone who is not versed in the subject, you've no qualification to make that statement.
web730 said:
Get back to the Bible and learn more and more then you should see the difference.
The Bible doesn't say anywhere in it that Muslims and Baha'is worship a different God.
web730 said:
To add: Messianic Jews are still Jews by blood, however. It remains as a fact no matter what you believe or say.
I've never said anything different. You, like Throwstones, put words in my mouth when I don't say the things you want me to. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. If you can't discuss my opinion based on what I actually said, sorry, but you lose automatically. Changing what I said does not work here.
Reba said:
Jesus was dead, and in the tomb three days. He was resurrected (bodily and spiritually) from that grave, and now lives eternally.
According to Christian Scripture..
Reba said:
That's pretty much your bottom line. If you refuse to accept that the Scriptures are true, then you can justify denial of all that it contains.
Indeed. The validity of a particular text is a matter of faith.
If I were so inclined, I could consider the plot of Final Fantasy VII to be divinely inspired and therefore worship Sephiroth. That would, of course, be nonsense, but you
Reba said:
The Bible clearly states that Jesus arose after three days in the grave. That you can't deny.
I can't deny what Christian scripture says, no. The books are there and assuming no one editted or translated them improperly, yes, they say what they say.
Reba said:
So, it's easier for you to deny the accuracy of the entire New Testatment Scriptures than to accept the truth therein.
Accept the truth therein? That's a loaded statement. You speak as if I'm denying a set-in-stone fact. Now, obviously, that is what you believe (you are, in your own words, a fundamentalist Christian), but you're also blind to the fact that not everyone has the same view of the world as you do.
Reba said:
If something in the Bible doesn't fit your personal beliefs, just push it aside.
Bacon cheeseburgers, Reba, bacon cheeseburgers... Oh, and four-cornered garments with fringes, too, can't forget those.
Reba said:
And yet . . . it is still there . . . .
And yet, the Tao Te Ching, the Qur'an, the Upanishads, the Vedas, the Zohar, etc. are still there. Just because the book exists does not make it true. You deny the legitimacy of every sacred text other than your own, why do you have a problem with someone denying the legitimacy of yours?
pek1 said:
It's the completion of Judiasm. You must not know the Torah very well or any of the Old Testament prophets of what they've said.
That's the typical Christian vantage point, though it's not true if the individual actually knows anything about Judaism. When you go and get educated in Judaism (and I mean from Jewish sources, not Christian sources), then, and only then are you allowed to discuss Judaism intelligently. As you are, at this time, ignorant, you have no basis on which to make the claim that Christianity is the completion of anything.
sculleywr said:
So your argument is that they were mythological. Good try, but read this very comprehensive argument:
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/fales.html
All religions are equally mythological, but that's what you (and a lot of the other people who have posted on this thread) simply don't get. Whether or not the text is true is not, and should never be, the most important thing. The most important thing should, in a religion, be what you do with the text you have.
sculleywr said:
Name one where the person was the center of scorn, a political enemy of the state, beaten so much that he was in hypovolemic shock and you could see his vital organs, then hung nude on a cross to die. Or you could tell me of one who suffered a like death and is still worshipped. Good luck.
Jesus was not the center of scorn or a political enemy of the state. If anything, he was fairly well respected. He was an enemy of Rome, yes, but the Jews in Judea didn't like Rome (and Rome didn't like them) anyway so that wasn't a problem.
sculleywr said:
have you forgotten that God promised in BOTH the Old and New Testament that the Jews would survive.
And yet, Christians to this day persecute them...
sculleywr said:
So what happens to people like Hitler, Osama Bin Ladin, Satan, the fallen angels, Suddam Hussein, etc.
If there is a punishment in the afterlife, they receive it.
sculleywr said:
I tell you, you are not Jew in race or religion.
As a gentile who has no legitimate understanding of Judaism, yeah, it'd be easy to make that determination on your part. You think you know more about Judaism than the people practicing it do. Why don't you just claim to be God too? You obviously believe you are.
sculleywr said:
You are not only a non-Jew, but you are a hypocrite. period. End of debate. bye.
I take it scathing criticism doesn't suit you. Sorry, but I won't bend over backwards and let you treat me poorly. If you want my respect, you have to respect me. There are several people on this forum that have earned that, people who I do not always (or even frequently) agree with, but I nonetheless respect them.
You have disrespected me, and therefore, unless you start treating me as an equal rather than as an inferior, I will respond in kind.