jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
I really hate to ruin the argument (not to mention, I feel bad that I cannot contribute to the actual topic of this discussion) but I have to point a few things out.
Jillio, I don't know you very well but it seems like you are doing a great thing. However, everyone needs to get their facts straight.
First of all, here's the quote from Cloggy's blog about his daughter's remark:
Second of all, the reason for the bad grammar might be due to the fact that English is not her first language. I think it's Dutch. So it might have nothing to do with a delay in language development.
....I see Cloggy said something about that... oh well
Thank you, getting back on topic would be wonderful. And I was aware of Cloggy's daughter's quote....I used it more than once when cloggy attempted to change the wording in a later post.
Oh, and Cloggy. Here's another miscommunication you should see:
See, when Jillio mentioned the 1920's being big on oralism, it's because he was responding to someone using evidence from someone's opinion back in the 1920's.
And, finally, can we all please read our facts, stop having hissy fits, and get back to the original topic??
Cloggy enjoys twisting words to try and portray an intent that was never there. It is a game he plays.