Death threats to Palin and her family

Status
Not open for further replies.
kokonut said:
It is still a physical attack. Not acceptable. Sorry.
Click to expand...

so don't throw it directly at the person :aw:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPsU-kSBnwI]YouTube - Ann Coulter gets pied.[/ame]
 
Let's apply that to the vice president and president then? No harm, right?

Again, not acceptable. It is a form of a physical violence intending to cause harm or otherwise.
 
Reba said:
I'm really disappointed to know that you support vandalism. :(
Click to expand...

It isn't conservative issue, I was aim at Tea Party as intensive group, bad as Marxist group.

I don't consider Tea Party as conservative but just more right wing, IMO because word for conservative is very broad.

Whatever about support or not support vandalism, I'm happy that they got attacked by other group, especially liberal because Tea Party is intensive and more extreme that what I dislike at most time.
 
Foxrac said:
It isn't conservative issue, I was aim at Tea Party as intensive group, bad as Marxist group.

I don't consider Tea Party as conservative but just more right wing, IMO because word for conservative is very broad.

Whatever about support or not support vandalism, I'm happy that they got attacked by other group, especially liberal because Tea Party is intensive and more extreme that what I dislike at most time.
Click to expand...
Like I posted, I'm disappointed that you approve of vandalism. Political disagreement is no justification for physical attack.

If you, or anyone, disagrees with what the Tea Party says, then you should fight back with well thought out words, not immature vandalism.
 
Reba said:
Please don't use such vulgar terms. It's very low class.
Click to expand...

Some words have different define so I consider teabagger as whoever is member of Tea Party and it don't seems like sexual word but just different meaning.
 
Reba said:
Like I posted, I'm disappointed that you approve of vandalism. Political disagreement is no justification for physical attack.

If you, or anyone, disagrees with what the Tea Party says, then you should fight back with well thought out words, not immature vandalism.
Click to expand...

That's fine, I'm sorry about it.

Tea Party isn't alone to be victim of vandalism so same goes to different groups like GOP and Dem are victim of vandalism as well.
 
Foxrac said:
Some words have different define so I consider teabagger as whoever is member of Tea Party and it don't seems like sexual word but just different meaning.
Click to expand...

That word is used on purpose as a derogatory meaning. Nothing more.
 
moving on.
 
Foxrac said:
Some words have different define so I consider teabagger as whoever is member of Tea Party and it don't seems like sexual word but just different meaning.
Click to expand...
Maybe you don't understand why it's offensive but it is, and the people who use it do so purposely to denigrate people of the Tea Party movement.

I wouldn't use any f-words to describe liberals, no matter what they do or say.
 
Reba said:
Maybe you don't understand why it's offensive but it is, and the people who use it do so purposely to denigrate people of the Tea Party movement.

I wouldn't use any f-words to describe liberals, no matter what they do or say.
Click to expand...

then what is best describe for Tea Party?
 
Foxrac said:
That's fine, I'm sorry about it.

Tea Party isn't alone to be victim of vandalism so same goes to different groups like GOP and Dem are victim of vandalism as well.
Click to expand...
That's why we're stating "aye" to agree that physical threats and attacks (including vandalism) are wrong to use against political opponents, no matter which "wing" they are.
 
Reba said:
That's why we're stating "aye" to agree that physical threats and attacks (including vandalism) are wrong to use against political opponents, no matter which "wing" they are.
Click to expand...

Even is revenge when people is pleased to do for just fun like pie throwing or water balloon during regular day, not about political?
 
Reba said:
That's why we're stating "aye" to agree that physical threats and attacks (including vandalism) are wrong to use against political opponents, no matter which "wing" they are.
Click to expand...

Right.

So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
 
Foxrac said:
Even is revenge when people is pleased to do for just fun like pie throwing or water balloon during regular day, not about political?
Click to expand...

Let's do that to Obama? Acceptable? Just because one disagrees with him?
 
Tousi, I don't know what it is. Going in circles or back tracking.
 
Foxrac said:
If he approves it then yes if he don't then it is unacceptable.
Click to expand...

Note, I said over a political disagreement doesn't give anyone the right to throw a pie or water balloon at Obama. That is an attack on the president. Not acceptable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top