I prefer a pie
Teabaggers has done to threaten or violence against others as well.
tsk tsk more vulgarity and hate
That sounds like blaming the victims of crimes for the attacks.Maybe people need to consider that they leave themselves open to radicals when they speak and act like radicals.
There is no "Teabaggers" group, and I would appreciate it if you could refrain from vulgarity.In the case of Palin and The Teabaggers.....they have reaped what they sowed.
Do you feel the same way about left-wing liars and fear-mongers? Do you think they deserve to be attacked?Tell lies and attempt to instill unreasonable fear in people and it comes back to bite them in the ass.
If anyone makes death threats against Obama, then they are wrong to do that.What about the number of people that hate Obama and make death threats against him? Heck, we've got a few haters right here at AD.
Does it occur to you that people can strongly disagree with Obama's policies and methods without hating him?Oh, yeah...I remember that thread. All the haters turned out for that one!:P
I'm really disappointed to know that you support vandalism.Good news for me because Tea Party is one of most moron organization that I had seen.
Please don't use such vulgar terms. It's very low class.Teabaggers has done to threaten or violence against others as well.
Please don't use such vulgar terms. It's very low class.
I don't see why it is so hard to come out and say that issuing threats to politicians or the destruction or damage of personal property is wrong whenever people disagree. I'd say it's wrong. Those who keep silent on this raises suspicion.
What do YOU say?
Oh, I don't hate Obama. I just disagree vehmently with his policies and actions. Like I said *numerous times* I think he'd be a cool dude to have a game of pick-up basketball or have a cold drink and ribs together. But that's about it. Other than that, he's way, way, wayyyyyyyyy over his head as president.
I don't see why it is so hard to come out and say that issuing threats to politicians or the destruction or damage of personal property is wrong whenever people disagree. I'd say it's wrong. Those who keep silent on this raises suspicion.
What do YOU say?
Oh, I don't hate Obama. I just disagree vehmently with his policies and actions. Like I said *numerous times* I think he'd be a cool dude to have a game of pick-up basketball or have a cold drink and ribs together. But that's about it. Other than that, he's way, way, wayyyyyyyyy over his head as president.
Let me tell you one thing. Once I could easily stand under a 10 ft tall basket hoop and jump up and grab the rim. I'm only 5' 8" Love shooting from the 3-point position and hear the swish. Played in a lot of pick up games in my life. Choose your bets wisely.
Yup, random attacks are wrong.....no matter who they are against. I would say the same if they were against Carville,Olberman, ED,Phlegler or Farrakhan.
I don't hate Obama either. He is welcome to join me, Bill Clinton and George Bush for a round of golf. I don't agree with those guys much either. We will probably make fun of Obama's swing alot, though. It is horrible.
Suppose I allow my friend to drive one of my cars. Then I see that friend driving that car recklessly so I say to another friend I must take that car back I don't like the way friend "A" is driving it. Does that mean I hate friend "A"????? That's all we are saying about Obama......we feel he is driving recklessly and we need to take the country back.
Basketball is my worst sport.....I am good on defense though. I can say if he enters the paint he is going to feel it the next day. That goes for anybody
Let me tell you one thing. Once I could easily stand under a 10 ft tall basket hoop and jump up and grab the rim. I'm only 5' 8" Love shooting from the 3-point position and hear the swish. Played in a lot of pick up games in my life. Choose your bets wisely.