1. The position of PFH is that the posts from Kokonut are pointless.
That's his opinion. I could ask the same question, too, but I don't. After all, this is a forum.
2. The position of Kokonut is that PFH want Kokonut to stop write posts(which is a distorted version of the position of PFH).
No, which is why I asked that question.
3. Kokonut attacks the position that says Kokonut should stop writing posts on AD.
Not an attack. Interesting way of putting that when all it was to ask a question because I wasn't sure of his intent in his questioning. Now that he made it clear, sure, I understand. *shrugs*4.
Now, Kokonut have made the position of PFH false and flawed. Notice that he did it by actually never attack the orginal claim from PFH, but a disorted claim.
Hence, my asking the question for clarification.
Classic straw man. GrendelQ does this a lot, too.
No straw man, PFH never stated his position in the first place. It was after the fact.