- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 8
oh that explains. how did a person die? was it something about pool?
Alcohol. Over-served person wrecked and killed a guy driving home.
oh that explains. how did a person die? was it something about pool?
it's most likely not in the area of $10,000 or $100,000. probably somewhere higher.
That's a common cause for suits now. Some of the bars in this area have been subject to them. (I live in a tourist area with lots of restaurants and bars.)Alcohol. Over-served person wrecked and killed a guy driving home.
That's a common cause for suits now. Some of the bars in this area have been subject to them. (I live in a tourist area with lots of restaurants and bars.)
Alcohol. Over-served person wrecked and killed a guy driving home.
See, that is the problem. A lot of people want to punish him. Most people think what he did was stupid. But there is just no legal justification for manslaughter. The prosecution provided nothing to prove manslaughter beyond a reasonable doubt.
I believe most if not all of the jury will see it your way but that isn't really a good thing. If that happens it means the jury acted out of emotion or fear rather than following the law. We all lose when that happens.
I totally agree. Any murder charge, whatever degree, was ridiculous, they never should have pursued that, manslaughter yes. I personally would hate for him to walk away with no punishment whatsoever. What he did was stupid, it was reckless and unnecessary and I have to wonder if he'd have even gotten out if his car if he wasn't armed. I highly doubt. You don't get to kill somebody just because they're beating you up.
He had called the non-emergency number, not 9-1-1, so he had no expectation of a quick response....Was he grossly outmanned? I don't think so, he had already spoken with 911, so he knew someone was on their way right?
He didn't use Stand Your Ground for his defense. He claimed simple self defense.I think if he walks away with no repercussions at all it will show that Stand Your Ground is far to loose, and far too easily abused....
second degree murder n. a non-premeditated killing, resulting from an assault in which death of the victim was a distinct possibility. Second degree murder is different from First Degree Murder which is a premeditated, intentional killing, or results from a vicious crime such as arson, rape, or armed robbery.
Looks to me like it perfectly fits the definition of second degree murder.
second degree murder legal definition of second degree murder. second degree murder synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.
He had called the non-emergency number, not 9-1-1, so he had no expectation of a quick response.
He didn't use Stand Your Ground for his defense. He claimed simple self defense.
Their code describes the "depraved mind" intent, in that I interpret that it means Zimmerman would have to have malicious intentions/thoughts/personality to kill someone.The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree and constitutes a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
I don't understand.This is true, otherwise he wouldn't have brought the gun with right.
Do you mean convicted, not charged?I don't care what he gets charged with as long as he doesn't walk away. You don't get to shoot someone because they broke your nose.
I don't understand.
Do you mean convicted, not charged?
Maybe, but it wasn't part of the Zimmerman case.But Stand Your Ground laws have been called into question because of it.
What do you mean?Regardless, he still had 8 weapons to defend himself with, he chose the gun.
Yup, it smells bad to just let him walk away. It also puts up a bad interpretation of the law if people can just justifiably kill a person within bounds and walk away without any repercussions. Just raises the likelihood of more cop-wannabes with ccw's out there causing trouble and using GZ's case to defend their rights.This is true, otherwise he wouldn't have brought the gun with right. I don't care what he gets charged with as long as he doesn't walk away. You don't get to shoot someone because they broke your nose.
He could have left the gun in his car, if he brought it that meant he thought he might be using it, which he did. And yes.
Yup, it smells bad to just let him walk away. It also puts up a bad interpretation of the law if people can just justifiably kill a person within bounds and walk away without any repercussions. Just raises the likelihood of more cop-wannabes with ccw's out there causing trouble and using GZ's case to defend their rights.
I am perfectly aware of the Stand Your Ground laws, but to me he had to prove that he thought his life was in danger, you can't just shoot somebody because you're a chicken shit. Was TM armed? With even a sling shot? No. He had a broken nose and a couple small cuts on the back of his head. Nothing life threatening. Was he grossly outmanned? I don't think so, he had already spoken with 911, so he knew someone was on their way right?
I think if he walks away with no repercussions at all it will show that Stand Your Ground is far to loose, and far too easily abused. Which in my opinion doesn't do us any good either.
Btw pot will not turn you into the Hulk or something.