Court of public opinion looms large in George Zimmerman murder trial

wow. yep I'm at loss for words. what I'm reading is a pretty strong case against Zimmerman.

Sanford Chief Police wasn't aware of Zimmerman's criminal history. I wonder if community wasn't aware of it either. This pretty much shows how shady Zimmerman is. and a violent one.

I'm not surprised that you think that. But most of the experts believe this case is a farce as well. But no biggie.
 
Most trial in criminal cases are serious, unlike in Zimmerman's trial that is full of joke?

Joke as in farce.....as in never should have been tried. If both of these guys had been the same race this case would have never been tried. At least not on this evidence. Maybe the prosecution has a surprise. :dunno:
 
Joke as in farce.....as in never should have been tried. If both of these guys had been the same race this case would have never been tried. At least not on this evidence. Maybe the prosecution has a surprise. :dunno:

Please prosecute me for internet trolling at Texan justice system that filled with joke.

I'm not guilty. *thanks to jurors* :cheers:

Texan justice system rocks. :lol:

j/k
 
I'm not surprised that you think that. But most of the experts believe this case is a farce as well. But no biggie.

most of the experts? who exactly?

and let me ask you this - now that you are aware of both of their "criminal" histories.... do you believe Trayvon was more violent than Zimmerman?
 
People can have violent natures without having criminal histories. That's especially true for juveniles.
 
most of the experts? who exactly?

and let me ask you this - now that you are aware of both of their "criminal" histories.... do you believe Trayvon was more violent than Zimmerman?

:dunno: There is no way to compare.
 
That's ok. You don't have to explain why you believe that isn't likely.... This isn't court. :)

I've already explained - several posts in fact. You seem to not understand it or... you're ignoring it entirely.
 
Meh, if you say so.

oh well. my posts are there for you to review at any time.

back to topic. the latest development in Zimmerman trial doesn't seem to be going well for defense.
 
One benefit for the defense team is that Zimmerman probably won't have to testify. He already told his story via the videotaped presentations to the court. Yet, he won't be subject to cross examination by the prosecution. So, that is all a plus for the defense.
 
Do you know what that means?

what it means is that Zimmerman either exaggerated or lied. and what it means that Trayvon was probably defending himself.

did you read rest of the testimony? The witness believed that Zimmerman was an aggressor and was on top of Trayvon.
 
Really? How come no injuries were found on TM's body except gunshot wounds? :hmm: Oh, she talked bullshit, didn't she? (Because TM was her friend so she can lie, right?)

Trayvon did sustain some wounds from fighting as noted in medical examiner's note.
 
Back
Top