Convicted cop killer executed in Texas

Foxrac said:
Fixed it for you.
Click to expand...

Hmmm :hmm:

Foxrac, do you honestly want to ride in a rocket to mars with me? Will you be the navigator or the geological astrophysicist?

awwwww :aw:
 
Last edited:
Steinhauer said:
Correction ... in some agencies, police dogs are sworn in law enforcement officers.

Police dogs are even given their own badge and ID's, and when one is killed in the line of duty, given a full police funeral.
Click to expand...
I've seen memorials and services for police and military dogs. I've participated in the military dog ceremony.

However, there is no way that a dog takes an oath.
 
Reba said:
I've seen memorials and services for police and military dogs. I've participated in the military dog ceremony.

However, there is no way that a dog takes an oath.
Click to expand...


k-9_oath_20130114211629_320_240.JPG



New_K_9_officers_in_Garfield_Heights_swo_233340000_20130114214841_640_480.JPG



http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-...ield-heights-two-welcome-two-new-k-9-officers
 
I believe the officer (dogs handler) vouches for the pup. They are trained together after the initial training of the pup.
 
a cop wear gun knows the score a small child raped tortchured murder an innocent and the beast gets out after twenty years...24 commit crime out at 44,as they say men make laws god metes out justice..
I think the illegal bit not the question he just one evil man but do killing him do any good dont seem deterrent to me,life time of no human contact never see sky bland food then give him the rope and let him swing by his own hand
 
sonocativo said:
Now it has to do with a deaf person?

sex with dogs, dogs and humans aren't the same classifications, deaf people....
Man youre out there.
Click to expand...

It is not about a deaf person. It was never about sex with dogs. What it is about is the ramifications of certain ideas. Ideas matter.
It was never about you. Although you keep wishing to make this about me. It isn't. I am not discussing " you". It is your ideology I am discussing. It's not personal. And it shouldn't be. It's about the ideology you so neatly put in a nutshell regarding the law. Is what I find interesting that a deaf person could hold
Given our history with the hearing world. And their "laws" and how their "laws" have been used against us, yes I find it interesting a deaf person would hold so religiously to them.
Arguing against "me" rather then my ideas is rather shallow. To quote Eleanor roselvet.
"Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas"

This discussion has never been about "me". Despite yours and chigagoblues efforts.
I hope this post find you we'll
 
How many Dogs did you eat in Mexico?....Did you Fry, Boil or BBQ them?...Or had Sex with?...
 
Jiro said:
Post #14
Click to expand...

Thank you for your reply jiro.

Here is post 14 of mine in its entirety. the post you cited, though did not provide.

"the article says he killed a cop. unless i misread it.
as for getting executed for killing a police pooch thats an outrage of justice in my opinion!!"

You claim I deny something in this post.
And you cited the post number.
So where am I denying anything int his post?
 
rockin'robin said:
How many Dogs did you eat in Mexico?....Did you Fry, Boil or BBQ them?...Or had Sex with?...
Click to expand...

I thought you do not wish to discuss anything with me or know what I think?

If your question is sincere I'll sincerely answer.
In Juarez in 93 eat some tortas with some locals that were of the local dogs used for cuisine.
As for having sex with dogs no. I never did. I only have sex with those of my own species.
Why are you now arguing police dogs are not "people"?
Interesting.
I hope I answered your question rockinrobin.
Thank you for asking.
 
Jiro said:
your reasoning is deeply flawed.
Click to expand...

ThAnk you jiro for your reply.
You keep stating my reasoning is flawed. I accept that. Sure. But rather then just state it. Demonstrate it.
Demonstrate where my reasoning is flawed.
I want to learn. I wish to improve my reasoning skills. You claim it's flawed. Pls by all means demonstrate it.

Jiro said:
we did not say dogs are humans. dogs are dogs..
Click to expand...

You and others are claiming police dogs are persons. With the same rights that entails. Pics have even been provided of dogs taking a oath. Tell me. How does an animal take an oath jiro?

Jiro said:
we are saying killing/assaulting a police dog is same as killing/assaulting a police officer..
Click to expand...

Yes indeed that is what you are saying. But how is killing a well trained beast. An animal. A k9' a dog, the same as killing a human being?
Indeed that is the crux of my argument and line of questioning. Where is the sameness? Killing a dog, killing a human. How is that in any way shape or I form the same thing?

Jiro said:
and that's the law. another thing - animal cruelty is against the law. and that's the law.
Click to expand...

Yes indeed that's the law. No doubt. Have I ever denied this?

Jiro said:
so is there a problem with these laws?
Click to expand...

Which laws you mentioned more then one. Be specific. We are after all discussing the LAW....
If your asking me if I have. Plm with animal cruelty laws my answer is no. If your asking if I have a fundamental plm in accepting the ideology of the state that declares dogs people and even has such dogs take "oaths" then my answer to that absurdity is yes I am me opposed to that ideology. Both on philosophical grounds as well as theological.
I hope my post as found you well.
 
hoichi said:
You and others are claiming police dogs are persons. With the same rights that entails. Pics have even been provided of dogs taking a oath. Tell me. How does an animal take an oath jiro?
.
Click to expand...

Ive explained that is a post above. 108
 
Back
Top