To answer your question - While it may seemingly to be advocated as a racism in your view. In my view it isn't racism. It is part of heritage. I know the Southern Cross is heavily represented or taken as a form of racism but there are a lot of other people who would view it as a heritage or a symbol of different purposes. This serves as a purpose of this thread to discuss about the same issues that can either be considered racism or not.
I am aware a lot of people use it as a symbol for racism. In the beginning, it wasn't for racism. It was to represent the 11 southern states that seceded from the Union. It is the same purpose for having the US Flag that represents this country with 50 stars and 13 stripes on it. Let's see, If the US Flag was represented for something else, would it make any difference or not? I'd like to hear this out.
No it wasn't used for racism. It was used for slavery.
Sorry but wasn't Kentucky a southern state as well? If so--isn't that clouding your argument that you have put forth in the above post?
Also in the highlighted section, jiro120 pointed out that there are other ways to show off one's southern heritage and pride, instead of flaming with the dixie flag.
I show off my Northwest heritage via foods, arts, and literature. No flag because bottom line--I'm an American first, Washingtonian second.
Not Southerner first, American second. Because that is b.s.