robbielyn said:
It's just as a "group" we have a good reputation as interpreters and I am sure there are alot of "individuals" such as yourselves that have excellent reputations too.
I personally have never heard of JWs having a good reputation as interpreters. I don't think we have a large JW community in the DC area, but I don't really know. I know one of the interpreter supervisors at my agency is a JW, he is pretty good but I always assumed that was more about natural skill than about his religion making him "want it" more. I have no idea if he is involved in religious interpreting outside of his professional work.
But let's go back to where this thread started: CODA terps. CODAs have a reputation as being great interpreters. The reason given is that they grew up with ASL as a first language. However, I know some CODAs who are terrible interpreters - leaving out information, sloppy signing, etc. They are fine for regular discussions in sign language, but not as interpreters. They may be fluent in ASL, but they do not have the natural skill with languages and so they are not good at their job. There are also CODAs who DO have excellent skill with languages and do great as interpreters. But again, it's not because they're fluent...it's because they're skilled.
Now let's try it with JWs. I'm told that JWs have a reputation as being great interpreters. The reason given is that they want to minister closely to Deaf people, so they are motivated to learn the language well. However, there are some JWs who are terrible interpreters - for whatever reason. They are fine for one-on-one ministry, but not as interpreters. They may know the language well, but they do not have the natural skill with languages and so they are not good at their job. There are also JWs who DO have excellent skill with languages and do great as interpreters. But again, it's not because their motivation to minister to Deaf people prompted them to become fluent in sign language...it's because they're skilled.
I guess what I am saying here is that age-old phrase:
A signer is not an interpreter. Just because someone is fluent in sign language doesn't mean they're a good interpreter. It takes a combination of natural skill and study of the interpreting process (models of interpretation, etc.) to be a good interpreter.
Now, it sounds to me like JWs become fluent in sign language because they want to have a
personal connection with the Deaf people they are ministering to. Going through a third-party interpreter is much more impersonal...I agree that if you are trying to minister to someone, it's best if you speak their language! But why does this mean that JWs are more skilled as
interpreters necessarily? Are the JWs who are highly motivated to learn sign language also highly motivated to go out and become interpreters, or are they more focused on one-on-one ministry? In the end...what does being a JW have to do with being an
interpreter as opposed to a
signer?