No, I'm not interested in those things. But even the most precious of material things that I could have, I would NOT bow down before it and pray to it, nor the person it represents.
I say again, the statues and the icons and the other things are there not so that we pray to them (statues or people) NONONONO.
I ask you, think about something you really like here on Earth. Suppose you have that in your room (let's say teddy bear). Suppose you kneel beside your bed and your teddy is on the bed same time. I can argue then that you are praying TO your teddy bear.
Are you praying to your teddy? No, how silly. But should I tell you not to pray beside your bed with your teddy there because I think you are praying to your teddy? No, because I don't know what your prayer is. I don't claim to know what goes through every persons head during prayer, I just know that Catholic Canon Law tells us that the Saints can gain intercession for us in Heaven.
No one in Heaven just "sits around" but neither do they receive prayers from people still living on earth. Prayer can be directed only to God, not thru anyone else.
Oh, so you know everything that happens in Heaven?
So you don't ask your family to help you pray? If we must pray ONLY to God, then if you ask your family (living) to help you pray you are blasepheming also.
If you truly want to follow the example of saints who have gone on before us, you would pray to and worship God the same way they did. They didn't pray to other people. They didn't pray to Moses and Abraham. They prayed to God only.
Did they tell you that?
As for Abraham and Moses, they were special mediators between God and the People. The People never prayed to God, only Abraham and Moses and other special mediators. In some ways we view the Saints as special mediators for us on Earth. Not fully the same no, because we can and do pray directly to God.
When Jesus gave us His examples of prayer, He never mentioned praying to other people.
Not TO, never TO.
How can you pray WITH a dead person? How can you speak to a dead person? Why would you? Jesus wants you to turn to Him. A Christian's goal is to become Christlike.
If you want to argue living vs dead. Jesus is dead, so by your arguement tells me that I can't pray to Jesus because he is dead.
Abraham and Elijah are dead also but Peter, James and John saw them with Jesus at the trasfiguration. So your arguement tells me they can't have - but the Bible tells me otherwise.
Plus we talk about Saints who are dead, but Saints are also alive (Peter and Paul both called the Christians alive at that time saints).
Paul also wrote that "we being many are one bread, and one body;" does that mean we are also eating each others' body too?
Of course not.
No, but my physical body is not attached to yours. This scripture refers not to the Lord's Supper, but to our function as Christian community. We can't all be "eyes" or "hands" in our Earthly life. We have different jobs here as followers of Christ, but that when everyone does their job we run smoothly as does a body in fit condition.
Same with the bread - each ingredient has a different function (flour, eggs, etc) but put them together and you get a loaf of bread.
Hands should be hands, Eggs should be eggs. That is - people called to serve as ministers should do so, people called to be actors should do so, called to work with the poor (etc).
Christians are supposed to partake in the Lord's Supper "in remembrance" of Him, not to reenact Christ's sacrifice. The bread and cup are not holy; only He is holy.
Catholics (in general) place the emphasis on the fact that Jesus said DO THIS, not "pretend to do this" or "do something like this". and THIS IS MY BODY not "this will represent my body to you".
If Jesus had wanted us to drink wine and eat bread he would have said something like this ---> This cup of wine is now the wine of the new covenant. This bread the bread of the new convenant.
But Jesus did say ---> "This bread is MY BODY, which will be given up for you. This cup is the BLOOD of the new covenant. DO THIS, and remember me."
More importantly, Paul met and knew the resurrected Christ. Peter was just another apostle.
So Peter didn't meet the resurrected Christ? I don't think so. Jesus met the Apostles many times. Jesus even fed the Apostles on the beach once. Jesus asked Peter "Do you Love me" AFTER he died.
Paul never actually met the Resurrected Christ, only heard him.
Don't forget that Jesus said "You are Peter, and on this Rock I will build my Church".
Paul did not say that he believed that the bread and wine were actually the body of Christ.
Yes, he did:
1 Corinthians 10
16. Is not the cup of blessing which we bless a sharing in the blood of Christ? Is not the bread which we break a sharing in the body of Christ?
This is a rhetorical question - Paul is reminding the saints at Corinth that it IS the body and blood.
1 Corinthians 11
27. Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.
If it is only bread and wine then how can one be a) unworthy to eat it and b)guilty of the body and blood?
I'm beginning to wonder why so much of your emphasis is on the necessity for depending on material things in order to focus on and remember Christ? (Images, candles, Rosary beads, Eucharist, crucifix, "saints", Mary, etc.)
Because we ARE human. If we didn't need material things we would be in Heaven already.
Plus Rosary beads are a counting system. Nothing more.
My
emphasis has been nothing but responding to your points.
The Catholic Church keeps many of the things you talk about because they come from tradition. If you come froma German background, maybe you keep a beerstein around or wear lederhosen? (OK maybe not lederhosen :giggles
Suppose you come from Japan - a Kimono is not out of place, when praticing Karate you wear a Gi and repeat a special creed - you also bow to your teacher and sometimes to the picture of a dead teacher (do you worship that?)
Maybe you go to the White House - should they take down the pictures of the Presidents? (Or for us Canadians Parliament Hill and the Prime Ministers)
If anything is being worshipped - those pictures are - people pay to see them, they are kept in special halls, people go in with very reverent feelings (many people). Or the statue of Abraham Lincoln, many people go there to TALK to Abe Lincoln :-o Blasphemy!!!
All of these things are traditions, doesn't mean they are wrong
Yes, I know about Passover.
Again, yes. The Passover Seder pictured the coming Christ.
I'm not telling the Jews how to perform their rituals because they aren't making claim of being Christians. Since they don't believe Jesus is the Messiah, why should they stop following their religion? It certainly doesn't make any sense to tell non-Christians that they should use Christian rituals. There is no spiritual value in non-believers being forced to follow believers' sacraments. In fact, that would be blasphemous. A Christian can't partake in the Lord's Supper until after believers' baptism, which happens after salvation. The Lord's Supper is for Christian believers only.
Ah, but before it was The Lord's Supper it was the Passover Seder, so you are still telling me that Jewish people can't take part in the Seder.
What do those verses have to do with Christ's body and blood? I don't see them mentioned in those verses.
What I meant with those passages is that Jesus gave the Apostles (and their successors) the power to forgive sins, heal people, perform the Lord's Supper as TRUE SACRIFICE - meaning that bread and wine become body and blood same as Christ did because HE gave them that power.
The body of Christ on earth is His church, the body of believers.
I agree with that.
The blood of Christ is sprinkled on the Mercy Seat in Heaven, forever cleansing our sins.
But we still have to admit our sins.
As an obedient earthly son, not as God reigning in Heaven.
So? Are you saying that Jesus chooses when He is God and when He is Man? That would be blasphemy. Jesus is GOD AND MAN BOTH at the same time. What Jesus as Man did, Jesus as God did same time. Plus if Jesus were choosing to be a Man at the Wedding of Cana, then He couldn't change water into wine, humans don't have that kind of power.
So no Catholics ever bow before Mary's image, pray to her, say the Rosary, or light candles to her? And the nuns no longer teach the kids at Catholic school that if Jesus won't let them into Heaven, Mary will open the back door and let them sneak in? Mary is no longer the Immaculate Conception who ascended to Heaven without experiencing death? Catholics now ignore the edict from Pope John Paul II encouraging the veneration of Mary? What about this:
Let me explain again, Mary is
Honoured, not Worshipped. You respect your mother yes? Catholics respect Mary as the Mother of God. Doesn't matter that God existed before Mary did, God as Jesus the Saviour in Human Form still lived inside her womb and was raised by her and Joseph.
Yes, we believe that Mary was concieved without sin and that she was raised to Heaven Body and Soul. No, we don't know for sure if Mary went to Heaven without death. The only one we can be sure of is Elijah as we can read in the Old Testament:
2 Kings 2
11. As they were going along and talking, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire and horses of fire which separated the two of them. And Elijah went up by a whirlwind to heaven.
12. Elisha saw it and cried out, "My father, my father, the chariots of Israel and its horsemen!" And he saw Elijah no more. Then he took hold of his own clothes and tore them in two pieces.
Yes, we follow the words of John Paul II. Veneration is not worship, veneration is honouring and respecting.
And the nuns no longer teach the kids at Catholic school that if Jesus won't let them into Heaven, Mary will open the back door and let them sneak in?
:giggles: That's cute. Maybe they taught that before Vatican II but not today!
Yes, I know about Maccabbees. That is not part of recognized canon of Scripture.
It is for Catholics, what you call the Apocrypha is part of the Canon of the Catholic Bible.
Yes, I know which Lazarus. If you notice in that story, living people on earth did NOT pray to any dead saints in Heaven.
Ah, but even the dead rich man should have prayed/talked directly to God, not to Abraham then. And since Jesus told the story, then I would rather think that He was right.
Some of the Jews might have believed that but that's not the way God did things--they believed in error. There is nothing in the Bible that says it's OK to pray to anyone other than God. There is nothing in the Bible that says it's OK to "talk" to dead people.
So you are the last authority on the way God does things? I don't claim to know exactly what God's plan is, but I certainly won't venture to say that the Jewish people of 3000 years ago are in error because "that's not the way God did things".
I'm referring specifically to lighting candles to hasten souls out of Purgatory and into Heaven, and for praying to Mary and saints. I'm not talking about lighting candles for mood or ambiance.
The candles are nothing more than a visual SYMBOL of the PRAYERS we make to God. Candles are candles, lighting a candle does nothing, if they did something then many more miracles would happen during power outs.
Plus, who said we light candles so we can pray to Mary and the Saints? I always thought that when I light a candle in prayer I am lighting it to center myself and represent my prayers to GOD.
"Start and end with God"--so to whom are you praying in between?
God. Maybe I wasn't quite clear. Maybe I say "Hello God, here I am. I have some requests to make. I want to thank you for some things. I want to tell you how I feel today (etc). You are the greatest. Thank you for listening, Goodbye God."
Maybe not great example, but crossing myself is like saying Hello and goodbye to God and in between I tell God exactly what I want to say.
You never pray to Mary or saints?
Again NEVER TO.
So how can you make such a blanket statement about all Catholics?
I am making statements about the Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church. I can't talk about any one person but myself. When I say Catholics I mean Canon Law. I should have said that before.
Jesus Christ wasn't baptized for the reason of salvation or church membership. He was sinless, so He didn't need to be saved first; He had no sins from which to be saved. Even John the Baptist recognized that. That's why he hesitated at first to baptise Jesus. Jesus insisted on begin baptised as a public example for the rest of us. All of us human sinners need to be saved first because we aren't sinless like Jesus. After we are saved, we are positionally sinless, and therefor are ready to be baptized in the manner of Jesus.
One person making a baptism decision and action for another is worthless. Each person, within his or her own heart, must make that decision, and it can only be made after salvation, which is also a personal decision.
That is what I am saying, Catholics have what is called Confirmation, means we accept and confirm our Baptism. Means we understand what Baptism is for and that we want to continue with that Baptism.
Baptism doesn't wash away sins. The sins are forgiven only thru personal repentance and acceptance of Jesus as Savior. Baptizing an unsaved person only makes them wet.
How come John the Baptist didn't baptize any babies?
Infant Baptism comes from Early Christian history when people were "With all their Household" (including babies). This is tradition that the Catholic Church kept and continues.