Black pastors bash NAACP for endorsing gay marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.
TXgolfer said:
Nope.
Click to expand...

well I'm sorry to hear that. I guess you're not going to stand up for people who get humiliated in public by ignorant bigots.
 
Jiro said:
perhaps you know exactly what I'm saying and I'm right on the dot.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm not even going to make a comment on your anti-religion post. I saw saw it as provoking. Religious debate is not permitted on AD
 
TXgolfer said:
Oh, I'm not even going to make a comment on your anti-religion post. I saw saw it as provoking. Religious debate is not permitted on AD
Click to expand...

then this thread is against AD rules since it's a religious subject :lol:
 
TXgolfer said:
Oh, I'm not even going to make a comment on your anti-religion post. I saw saw it as provoking. Religious debate is not permitted on AD
Click to expand...

but... both of I and Steinhauer had religious debate about church vs. church. :aw:
 
Foxrac said:
but... both of I and Steinhauer had religious debate about church vs. church. :aw:
Click to expand...

I wouldn't really call that a religious debate....perhaps you saw it that way.
 
TXgolfer said:
I wouldn't really call that a religious debate....perhaps you saw it that way.
Click to expand...

Would it be possible if you can stop nitpicking on foxrac? It's not a pretty sight. I see it as borderline-cyberbullying and I'm sure you disagree but he has already repeatedly stated that English is not his strong forte so don't be a buffoon and let's cease this quibbling around.
 
TXgolfer said:
That's easy....end government sanctioned marriage.
Click to expand...

Yup, it is much easier than being done.

It looks like everyone will have to pay single tax rate like back in 1930's when IRS didn't offer jointly/married tax rate.

Hey man, I'm going to Mickey Marriage Center to apply for marriage with my partner, j/k... :lol:
 
Jiro said:
Would it be possible if you can stop nitpicking on foxrac? It's not a pretty sight. I see it as borderline-cyberbullying and I'm sure you disagree but he has already repeatedly stated that English is not his strong forte so don't be a buffoon and let's cease this quibbling around.
Click to expand...

There wasn't any nitpicking....It appears you have misunderstood again.
 
Jiro said:
in case you didn't know... whether or not of government redefines marriage law... the law prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, national origin, familial status, and disability. and it has been like this for a long time.
Click to expand...
For marriage?

I don't think so.

Familial status--the law does discriminate as to marriage. The law doesn't allow siblings to marry each other, or parents to marry their children.

To which law are you referring? Please cite the statute.
 
Jiro said:
I'm not proposing for end of government control. we need government control otherwise these religious nuts would destroy this country with bigotry in the name of holy war like how they destroyed the civilizations in the past.
Click to expand...
Wow!

last time I recall... the government (for the people, by the people) still controls this country... not church. the day church rises up to sieze control of this country is the day of XIII :cool2:
Click to expand...
Thirteen what?
 
Jiro said:
well I'm sorry to hear that. I guess you're not going to stand up for people who get humiliated in public by ignorant bigots.
Click to expand...
To whom are you referring? Who is getting humiliated in public, and by whom?
 
Reba said:
For marriage?

I don't think so.

Familial status--the law does discriminate as to marriage. The law doesn't allow siblings to marry each other, or parents to marry their children.
Click to expand...
common sense......

Reba said:
To which law are you referring? Please cite the statute.
Click to expand...
discrimination law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top