- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
So why would pro-life Dems be against that? That doesn't make sense.Because Federal funding will not be used to pay for abortions.
So why would pro-life Dems be against that? That doesn't make sense.Because Federal funding will not be used to pay for abortions.
If he knew that abortion wasn't included, why was he against the bill until he got Obama's promise for the executive order? If it wasn't in the bill that wouldn't be necessary.
So why would pro-life Dems be against that? That doesn't make sense.
So why would pro-life Dems be against that? That doesn't make sense.
That was the reason given by Stupak and the pro-life Dems. Are you saying that they weren't being honest about their reasons?Numerous reasons. The bill is not about the singular issue of abortion. No matter how obsessed some are with the topic.
Maybe in the world beyond the looking glass.It makes perfect sense.
I can see the fervor over tax dollars going for abortions, but I also see my tax dollars used for things I am vehemently opposed to, such as the Iraq war. I guarantee than more than half my taxes go for things I have no desire to sponsor. Maybe we should have a charity Iraqi invasion force.
That was the reason given by Stupak and the pro-life Dems. Are you saying that they weren't being honest about their reasons?
Stupak said that he was against the bill because it included funding for abortions.You will have to ask Stupak that question. I'm certain he has his reasons....
Why not? And a charity to cover vasectomies.
Maybe in the world beyond the looking glass.
Stupak said that he was against the bill because it included funding for abortions.
Was he uninformed about the bill or was he a liar?
Or was he telling the truth?
He only changed his vote because Obama promised to put out an executive order to prevent the funding of abortions in the plan. Why would Obama have to do that if the funding wasn't in the plan? Is Obama uninformed about the bill, too? Apparently he must believe the funding is included or he wouldn't need to offer the executive order.
A much needed one! :rofl2:
That would save a lot!
Women can get their tubes tied. Federally funded.
Men should have that option too.
Well, the abortion provision is not going to be included in the health care plan. So the abortion debate is over. It's not going to be a benefit in the plan. Except under the executive order.
Yiz
Well, the abortion provision is not going to be included in the health care plan. So the abortion debate is over. It's not going to be a benefit in the plan. Except under the executive order.
Yiz
In other words, you have no logical answer. I understand.What exactly does that have to do with the childish and innappropriate behavior exhibted by the TX governor? Just a reminder: the title of the thread is "Babykiller shouted at Dem after bill's passage."
In other words, you have no logical answer. I understand.
It probably wasn't the best idea to shout out after the vote but I can understand the sentiment. The unborn can't shout out for themselves, so sometimes others feel compelled to do it for them.