Attn: Eve

Status
Not open for further replies.
What’s the matter, Angel and Cheri? Afraid you will have to actually behave if someone other than RR is keeping watch over the forum as well? I have been extremely fair on another forum where I am a mod. I am able to separate personal from business, unlike some in this forum. I have never had the responsibility on this forum which would require me to be unbiased and behave, but given that opportunity I certainly wouldn’t abuse it. I haven’t seen that ability displayed here very well so far. In fact, I find it rather amusing that the two of you would dare to come in here speaking of “favoritism”. *scoffs*

I had/have no intentions of “voting” on this forum. I was/am willing to leave selection of future mods up to Alex. However, Vampy did suggest sending recommendations to him and I suggest that rather than belittling anyone personally on this forum, we start looking at those who exemplify the character we believe a good mod would have and tell Alex and Vampy of our recommendations. That seems to be the more positive approach, rather than everyone jumping to conclusions and making personally attacking posts all over the board.

I'm sorry if you feel I offense you both
No you’re not. You are just able to get away with it because of who your bf is. Anyone else would receive a stern warning or, in some extreme cases, be banned for sharing “views/opinions that’s considered insulting”. However, I personally feel you have the right to your opinions and would never assume to discipline you for saying what is on your mind, no matter how much I may disagree with it.

I will be perfectly happy with anyone that Alex chooses to help conduct his forum, as long as the person is able to moderate in an unbiased manner. As I said before, I was trying to draw attention to the problem here on AD of not having enough impartial mods and the best way I knew to draw attention was to stir things up a bit. I think I accomplished that goal.
 
Eve..

In other words.. If you or other ADers... are not happy with Mods..

Just leave.. and set up your own forums..

No one is perfect.. its Alex's decisions and he comfortable with the forums running.... and responsible..

whats more.. If you dont like or is not happy with one of Mods.. just PM to Alex or email.. why or explain that you arent too happy with one of Mods...

and you point out to some of Aders... like cheri and angel.. like i said.. each people have different opinions.. I dont see any judgementals or favoriusms.. They just speaking their own words and feel about some people.. I take that you are offended by it..

since Alex posted his own thread about Mods.. he made the points...

I guess I can ask one of Mods to close this thread cuz its done.. it doesnt mean that I am run away or get away.. why should we continue discussion about this since Alex already posted..

:D have good day .. take care.. stay happy and peace with AD..
 
Eve said:
What’s the matter, Angel and Cheri? Afraid you will have to actually behave if someone other than RR is keeping watch over the forum as well?

Eh? You have no clue at all about anything do you? Even Alex knows that Roadrunner had removed, edited, even pmed me about my posts that are uncall for, So don't sit here and tell me that I am afraid that I won't actually behave if we do have new moderators.


I will be perfectly happy with anyone that Alex chooses to help conduct his forum, as long as the person is able to moderate in an unbiased manner. As I said before, I was trying to draw attention to the problem here on AD of not having enough impartial mods and the best way I knew to draw attention was to stir things up a bit. I think I accomplished that goal.

The problems here in AllDeaf are not based on how many moderators we have, It based on how members been posting, starting a flame war in threads that kept going at it, How is that the moderator's fault? {just because members cannot think twice before pressing the submit}. If members would have listen to the moderators to know when to back off then they wouldn't have gotten warned, banned, etc. That is what the problem layed here in AllDeaf.
 
Eh? You have no clue at all about anything do you? Even Alex knows that Roadrunner had removed, edited, even pmed me about my posts that are uncall for, So don't sit here and tell me that I am afraid that I won't actually behave if we do have new moderators.
And yet I don't recall you being banned when you told a few members to go fuck themselves (maybe you should take your own advice). *shrugs* couldnt possibly have been favoritism, nah.
 
Eve said:
And yet I don't recall you being banned when you told a few members to go fuck themselves (maybe you should take your own advice). *shrugs* couldnt possibly have been favoritism, nah.


Huh? :confused: I did not told anyone to go f**k themselves. Where did you hear that from?
 
Eve said:
And yet I don't recall you being banned when you told a few members to go fuck themselves (maybe you should take your own advice). *shrugs* couldnt possibly have been favoritism, nah.

whoa whoa whoa....it was not cheri that said this it was angel that said this
 
heh...Eve's sure embrassassing herself, eh? :popcorn: popcorn, anyone?
 
Hey Mod,

I recommend this site needs to be closed due isn't proprite getting worst.

Needs to :locked:

:ty:
Take care...
 
Hmm, I see some people here are resorting to mocking Eve after they attacked her for making a lil' snide remark toward Cheri.

Such hypocrites.
 
Bullym0m said:
Hey Mod,

I recommend this site needs to be closed due isn't proprite getting worst.

Needs to :locked:

:ty:
Take care...

Hey honey --

It's up to MsGiglz to decide if, she wants her thread to be :locked: or not.
 
yeah banjo, tis typical. and funny how short people's memories are around here. i would pull up the topic for all to see what I was referring to, but alas the topic was closed and is no longer accessible.

heh...Eve's sure embrassassing herself, eh?
nope. just stating the facts.
 
RedWolf said:
whoa whoa whoa....it was not cheri that said this it was angel that said this

Oh, ^Angel^ did said that ? Well, if that's true - then she ain't no angel like she thinks she really is. Her halo is meaningless like there's nothin' on her head. Sorry to say all this, folks. I am statin' this fact.
 
Actually, the post I am referring to took place several months ago. Cheri told OB and I to go fuck a broom, or something to that effect. Regardless, OB and I got banned for far less. Did someone mention favoritism?
 
Banjo said:
Hmm, I see some people here are resorting to mocking Eve after they attacked her for making a lil' snide remark toward Cheri.

Such hypocrites.

Humility does her good so Eve needs to taste her own bitter medicine. :whistle:
 
Cookie Monster said:
Humility does her good so Eve needs to taste her own bitter medicine. :whistle:

And, why is this? She is only stating the facts as they happened. She is correct about what she said. That member did say that, but the thread was removed. I really think you need to take a step back, and not comment unless you are really sure of what you are speaking out about. That incident that Eve referred to took place before your reapperance on AD, and it was directed at the two of us. I saw the comments, and I can state plainly that it was as Eve said. If the offending member chooses to deny it, that's up to her. I stand by what I say.
 
Reba said:
This thread reminds me of the election process for Pope. One Cardinal said, "If one actively seeks the position, that is not the one that will be chosen."

Sometimes the person most suited for a position is the one least likely to want it.

To quote Albus Dumbledore,

"Only one who wanted to find the Stone - find it, but not use it - would be able to get it, otherwise they'd just see themselves making gold or drinking Elixir of Life"

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone p. 217 (CDN Paperback Edition)

P.S., I know you disapprove of the books, but just thought it was necessary to quote this since it rings a familiar sound to what you said. :)
 
Banjo said:
...P.S., I know you disapprove of the books, but just thought it was necessary to quote this since it rings a familiar sound to what you said. :)
Just for the record, I don't think adults are unduly influenced by reading them. ;)

I think it is a common literary theme that leaders and heroes often become great because they have greatness thrust upon them, not because they seek it.

If you don't mind, I will make a couple biblical allusions. When God wanted Moses to lead the Jews, Moses didn't feel worthy. God chose David to rule over the kingdom but he didn't want to take the throne from Saul.

Or an historical example: Sergeant York (one of my favorites). A pacifist who became the most-decorated soldier of WWI.

Not that I am equating forum moderating with ruling a kingdom or fighting a war! :D
 
CyberRed said:
Hey honey --

It's up to MsGiglz to decide if, she wants her thread to be :locked: or not.


I agreed... its getting out of hand.. I already said earlier that Mods can close this thread.. but.. I am requesting again to close this thread..


Mods... please close this thread.. thank you... :lock:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top