AlleyCat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2005
- Messages
- 18,779
- Reaction score
- 2,285
Wirelessly posted
there are a lot of people who would disagree with that.
Show us some specific posts. Back up your argument.
Wirelessly posted
there are a lot of people who would disagree with that.
Wirelessly posted
i have never ever said it was impossible. I have always said the same thing.
I must agree with PFH. My reading on this forum has been reduced to a certain few forums where the blatant audism is absent. No amount of teaching can help a person who does not wish to learn.
i must agree with pfh. My reading on this forum has been reduced to a certain few forums where the blatant audism is absent. No amount of teaching can help a person who does not wish to learn.
WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?! Ummm faire joure why are you SO fixtated on the opinon that lip/speechreading is a "crutch?" So if lip/speechreading is hard, imagine how hard it is for someone who's functionally hoh to excluisively use their residual hearing? Many of us CAN in short bursts.....I actually just had my hearing aid off, and I heard my mom say I could have the bath.f you can understand a strangers spoken language without lipreading, great. That is the point of the CI, to provide that opportunity for profoundly deaf children. Most profoundly deaf people can not do that. They say that they lipread, that it is exhausting, and that it still leaves much to be desired. That there are tons of misunderstandings with lipreading and that, if fact, most of them avoid it whenever possible.
Are you aware there are many dhh people with oral fluency who have pretty decent speechreading skills? Speechreading is MORE then just reading lips.so you would recommend that as a reliable method of communication?
Well, that's what she uses on a daily basis. Doesn't seem to be a problem for her.
there are a lot of people who would disagree with that.
True. By reading the multiple posts I have learned a great deal regarding the meaning of audism and prejudice.
Thank you for your valid viewpoint.
You see, some people try to understand where disagreements arise from, not just what other people think.I'm very interested in what other people think, I just won't speak on their behalf. You ask me why the majority thinks a certain way that's different from what I think. I don't know, and won't put my words in their mouths.
Sorry, but I don't get what you are saying. Could you try to define 'anti-CI' a bit more clearly?No. My definition is someone who says that he or she is against CIs. You say you are anti-CI. I told you I respected your position, even though I'm not anti-CI.
I don't think that someone who chooses not get get a CI is anti-CI. My father had qualified and opted not to get one. My mother in law would never dream of having surgery to gain hearing. Neither were/are anti CI. I know several children whose parents have opted not to pursue a CI, some probably never considered it. I don't see them as anti-CI.
How hundred of thousands of deaf people have described audist behavior among their loving parents and your claim that you would be surprised if Rick was an audist because he has a deaf daughter don't add up.I think I've been as direct as possible. How can you think I'm not answering?
I haven't seen a post indicating that he feels that those with the ability to hear are superior to those who are deaf. And I'd be pretty surprised to see that, bc his own child is deaf.
flip said:Sorry, but I don't get what you are saying. Could you try to define 'anti-CI' a bit more clearly?No. My definition is someone who says that he or she is against CIs. You say you are anti-CI. I told you I respected your position, even though I'm not anti-CI.
I don't think that someone who chooses not get get a CI is anti-CI. My father had qualified and opted not to get one. My mother in law would never dream of having surgery to gain hearing. Neither were/are anti CI. I know several children whose parents have opted not to pursue a CI, some probably never considered it. I don't see them as anti-CI.
flip said:How hundred of thousands of deaf people have described audist behavior among their loving parents and your claim that you would be surprised if Rick was an audist because he has a deaf daughter don't add up.I think I've been as direct as possible. How can you think I'm not answering?
I haven't seen a post indicating that he feels that those with the ability to hear are superior to those who are deaf. And I'd be pretty surprised to see that, bc his own child is deaf.