Yes, what you said is correct about human because we including good and bad people all are human being but I stated the serial killer/murder is not human but monster is my opinion.
Yes, you said about inhumane is fact, we all know. I rather to call them as monster, not human is my opinion.
I sometimes feel that you play teacher and correct us about the fact when we state our opinion. I can understand that you beleive in fact, not opinion. I think I should say next time: "I disagree that he is a human but monster IMO" then you will know that IMO mean is my opinion, not fact.
I hope my post do not upset you when I try to explain the difference between fact and opinoin.
If you are upset over my post then accept my apology please.
I am sorry.
I have not left (but I surely wanted to, for a bit).
I will try to explain my position.
I do not see what calling someone a 'monster' brings to the discussion, aside from the fact that you are just saying what you feel like saying.
I just did not understand when you said you DISAGREE, that they were not 'just human' but also monsters.
I was trying to get somewhere objectively with denotation (what things actually mean) and you bring subjective connotation (how you feel about something, in your experience) and you say you disagree with what I said, on that basis.
The two things do not mix.
I was trying to point out that any human can be cruel, no matter their position. Yes, this
should be obvious, but people tend to forget quickly when someone brings in emotionally charged metaphors. It is too easy to have an agenda with no objective basis, when you start using words like 'monster' in a discussion.
That, is why I got upset.
Edit:
I also try to make everything I do have a reason.
And if it seems to you like I am 'teaching', then that most likely has a reason, too.