A Solder Threw A Puppy Away

:confused: Hilter is an animal lover and vegetarian and do not allow anyone test animals during WWII.

That is just fake rumor..

Yes he dont eat meat cuz his doctors told him to cut out meat cuz of his health problems...

That make ppl think he is animal lover.. which isnt true..
 
Yes, that's right *some* people did wrong/horrible but I do not agree that they are just humans.

I rather to not post the link here because it's worst pictures to see... If you want to see then PM me.

What do you propose they are? Aliens?

If you are born from a human mother, and a human father, then you are a human. Ethics and morality does not enter into it.

Edit:
Oh. And they may be inhumane, but it takes a human to be inhumane.
 
What do you propose they are? Aliens?

Huh? Yes I know what human is about. What I said that they are not human is my opinion. Yes, I call them monster, not human.

If you are born from a human mother, and a human father, then you are a human. Ethics and morality does not enter into it.

You do not need to convince me... I know what it is about.
Edit:
Oh. And they may be inhumane, but it takes a human to be inhumane.

Of course I know what it is about. Yes what they did is humane but I only voice my opinion that they are not human but MONSTER.

I begin notice that you correct us and think we don´t know. Yes we all know what it is about but it´s my OPINION. Get it?



 
Huh? Yes I know what human is about. What I said that they are not human is my opinion. Yes, I call them monster, not human.



You do not need to convince me... I know what it is about.


Of course I know what it is about. Yes what they did is humane but I only voice my opinion that they are not human but MONSTER.

I begin notice that you correct us and think we don´t know. Yes we all know what it is about but it´s my OPINION. Get it?




Well, you just corrected my objective opinion with your arbitrary opinion!

When I say they are human, it has nothing to do with how I feel about it, it has to do with facts.

It is almost if I say the sky is blue, you will say it is a very light shade of cobalt, (which is still blue)
 
I apologize if I have been a bit harsh lately.

I don't have anything against anyone.

But it drives me absolutely insane when people mix connotation with denotation, like they are the same thing.
 
Well, you just corrected my objective opinion with your arbitrary opinion!

When I say they are human, it has nothing to do with how I feel about it, it has to do with facts.

It is almost if I say the sky is blue, you will say it is a very light shade of cobalt, (which is still blue)

Yes, what you said is correct about human because we including good and bad people all are human being but I stated the serial killer/murder is not human but monster is my opinion.

Yes, you said about inhumane is fact, we all know. I rather to call them as monster, not human is my opinion.

I sometimes feel that you play teacher and correct us about the fact when we state our opinion. I can understand that you beleive in fact, not opinion. I think I should say next time: "I disagree that he is a human but monster IMO" then you will know that IMO mean is my opinion, not fact.

I hope my post do not upset you when I try to explain the difference between fact and opinoin.

If you are upset over my post then accept my apology please.


 
Hi Liebling -- looks like jenni-m left the forum -- she put a thread saying "she has had it!" with us :roll:

I totally understand what you were saying -- you were stating YOUR opinion. And I agree with it.
 
Hi Liebling -- looks like jenni-m left the forum -- she put a thread saying "she has had it!" with us :roll:

I totally understand what you were saying -- you were stating YOUR opinion. And I agree with it.

WHAT? :eek3: Where? I am going to search her thread.


:ty: for know my POV.
 
Yes, what you said is correct about human because we including good and bad people all are human being but I stated the serial killer/murder is not human but monster is my opinion.

Yes, you said about inhumane is fact, we all know. I rather to call them as monster, not human is my opinion.

I sometimes feel that you play teacher and correct us about the fact when we state our opinion. I can understand that you beleive in fact, not opinion. I think I should say next time: "I disagree that he is a human but monster IMO" then you will know that IMO mean is my opinion, not fact.

I hope my post do not upset you when I try to explain the difference between fact and opinoin.

If you are upset over my post then accept my apology please.



I am sorry.

I have not left (but I surely wanted to, for a bit).

I will try to explain my position.
I do not see what calling someone a 'monster' brings to the discussion, aside from the fact that you are just saying what you feel like saying.

I just did not understand when you said you DISAGREE, that they were not 'just human' but also monsters.

I was trying to get somewhere objectively with denotation (what things actually mean) and you bring subjective connotation (how you feel about something, in your experience) and you say you disagree with what I said, on that basis.

The two things do not mix.

I was trying to point out that any human can be cruel, no matter their position. Yes, this should be obvious, but people tend to forget quickly when someone brings in emotionally charged metaphors. It is too easy to have an agenda with no objective basis, when you start using words like 'monster' in a discussion.

That, is why I got upset.

Edit:
I also try to make everything I do have a reason.
And if it seems to you like I am 'teaching', then that most likely has a reason, too.
 
Back
Top