faire_jour
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,188
- Reaction score
- 3
I ask you a question as a hearing person. Which sounds better?
To me, I doubt I could tell much difference.
I ask you a question as a hearing person. Which sounds better?
But natural hearing is not possible for deaf people right now.
give it a try. BEcause CI is doing to work to transfer sounds to our ears using a microphone.
is this thread about NOW or future??? are you trying to direct us into a direction?
Ha. knew it would end up this way.. ..
Dude, you brought this section up!
This is exactly What I was talking about in my last post.
Your hostility is palpable and why? Just because I gave an opinion and stated I was hearing? See, you assumed I was deaf, didn't you? Once I said I was hearing, the hostility shows through.
That's just sad.
But, I will tell you. I have friends who are deaf. People I care about very much. I joined this forum back in 2004 because a good friend of mine joined. She's gone from the forum now, but, I stayed because I made friends.
As for the rest of your accusations, that's not what I'm doing at all. I know that the one size fits all approach won't work. I support implantation, but, I also support ASL for all deaf people. Because, the reality is, amplification has it's drawbacks. No matter how good someone is at speech reading, they will miss what's being said. Cochlear implants work very well for the majority of deaf people, but there are circumstances where the hearing is less than optimal. That's been proven, so, say what you will.
I know what I'm about. I know what my intentions are, and I know, what I believe. If you choose to accept what I say or reject it, that's up to you. Regardless, that won't change the fact that I care very deeply for deaf people.
Oh, and btw, just so you know... I've been in a wheelchair from the age of 4, and without the ability to walk from birth, so, I'm not just blowing smoke here. I know very well that one may need to get creative to make something work for them. I've been adapting to life my entire life. It's not a new concept for me.
Have a nice day.
Wirelessly posted
My daughter plays piano: her teacher can him a tune and Li will then okay it exactly right.
deafgal001 said:I have talked to MANY people who have both. As well as people who were hearing and then got CI's. Many of them say that after a while the CI is as good as their hearing was. (And that is because the key is your brain, not the electrode.)
Which sounds better, High end stereo recording of a person talkngi, or a real person talking? remember, it is the CI processor that doing all the work.
I like having you here!
Wirelessly posted
To a deaf child? A high end stereo-- or a 3rd gen tape on a Mickey Mouse tapedeck -- sounds better, via CI than a live person talking, without the CI.
how do you reach to this conclusion??
posts from hell said:Wirelessly posted
To a deaf child? A high end stereo-- or a 3rd gen tape on a Mickey Mouse tapedeck -- sounds better, via CI than a live person talking, without the CI.
how do you reach to this conclusion??
What are the downsides to amplification? And deaf kids who hear don't need to read lips, that is the point of hearing well.
Yay for Oceanbreeze!
For the original question, I think "cure" would mean being born without deafness, and never knowing a moment of what it felt like.
For the original question, I think "cure" would mean being born without deafness, and never knowing a moment of what it felt like.