SimplyMints
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- 0
I really have no desire to become hearing again. In fact, I have a strong desire to remain deaf. However, if a cover-all-ends cure for deafness sweeps the deaf community out of existence, I would be forced to follow suit and accept the cure for the sake of my own success in life.
However, I don't know what the cure could possibly be. The most inclusive "cure" I've ever heard of would be an auditory nerve implant, which requires a functional auditory nerve. This would bypass every problem there could possibly be with the ears, and would provide flawless, natural hearing that will eventually be developed to be invisible, hidden deep inside the ear canal with never a need to change batteries. However, this will not cure those of us who have auditory nerve damage. We would be scattered and alone after I would guess about 95% of the deaf community has been assimilated by the hearing medical community's "cure."
When last I heard, 10 years would seem to be the approximate timeframe for the completion of the human testing phase and putting it out onto the general American market. I haven't read very much about their progress recently, though, especially since I found out that I wouldn't be a candidate. But it worries me that they will destroy a culture that is older than any human alive today, along with its language, and would disburse my only hope for a community with which I can associate, and result in the elimination of all remaining support for deaf needs, along with any hope of ever getting it back.
As a result, if a new cure were to be offered to me that would cure my deafness, in the shadow of the demolition of Deaf culture and the Deaf world, I would be forced to accept it and become a refugee in the hearing world. I wouldn't gripe or fuss about it because it wouldn't do a darn bit of good.
While we're at it, thought, I'm curious. Why don't we work on a cure for the empathically and telepathically impaired, and one for those of us who have no ultra-red, EM charge, and heat-sensing vision? Surely, that would make us more efficient and productive, and would reduce the need for the government to provide a lot of protection services. They wouldn't even need to provide free council or assemble a jury because the judge would be able to read our minds.
However, I don't know what the cure could possibly be. The most inclusive "cure" I've ever heard of would be an auditory nerve implant, which requires a functional auditory nerve. This would bypass every problem there could possibly be with the ears, and would provide flawless, natural hearing that will eventually be developed to be invisible, hidden deep inside the ear canal with never a need to change batteries. However, this will not cure those of us who have auditory nerve damage. We would be scattered and alone after I would guess about 95% of the deaf community has been assimilated by the hearing medical community's "cure."
When last I heard, 10 years would seem to be the approximate timeframe for the completion of the human testing phase and putting it out onto the general American market. I haven't read very much about their progress recently, though, especially since I found out that I wouldn't be a candidate. But it worries me that they will destroy a culture that is older than any human alive today, along with its language, and would disburse my only hope for a community with which I can associate, and result in the elimination of all remaining support for deaf needs, along with any hope of ever getting it back.
As a result, if a new cure were to be offered to me that would cure my deafness, in the shadow of the demolition of Deaf culture and the Deaf world, I would be forced to accept it and become a refugee in the hearing world. I wouldn't gripe or fuss about it because it wouldn't do a darn bit of good.
While we're at it, thought, I'm curious. Why don't we work on a cure for the empathically and telepathically impaired, and one for those of us who have no ultra-red, EM charge, and heat-sensing vision? Surely, that would make us more efficient and productive, and would reduce the need for the government to provide a lot of protection services. They wouldn't even need to provide free council or assemble a jury because the judge would be able to read our minds.