‘Justice for Trayvon’: Alabama Man in Critical Condition After Mob Beating

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. I'm confused why you've decided to come back as "Waterboy" when you said you were done with this site. I think all parties were quite satisfied with that conclusion. Naturally, your friends were too. Don't you have anything better to do with your time than trolling and starting flame wars?

Well, you are giving perfect examples of how to start a flame war. I am discussing Zimmerman's case and the new developments that he lied about income to the court.
 
You must be very confused too.

If people would stick to the topic, there wouldn't be any problems. Evidently, some people just can't do that.

Okay....Trayvon Martin and the Zimmerman case...
I hope you don't mind me asking one question. If Zimmerman is acquitted, will you get involved if there is a riot?
 
I hope you don't mind me asking one question. If Zimmerman is acquitted, will you get involved if there is a riot?

I don't think he will be acquited, and there is nothing to prove that there will be a riot if he is. But if he is looking for an acquital, he is going about it the wrong way by lying to the court. Doesn't say much for his story being believable.

I don't riot. Never have, never will. But what about Zimmerman lying about not having any income or assets?
 
Well, you are giving perfect examples of how to start a flame war. I am discussing Zimmerman's case and the new developments that he lied about income to the court.

So, you don't deny coming back under a "false" name after having been banned and leaving the AD?

Just to stay on topic...Zimmerman & Martin.
 
So, you don't deny coming back under a "false" name after having been banned and leaving the AD?

Just to stay on topic...Zimmerman & Martin.

Then don't ask off topic questions. No, I don't join in with all this silly stuff.

So, what about Zimmerman lying about the money he had in the bank and claiming to be indigent? What do you think about that?
 
Well, you are giving perfect examples of how to start a flame war. I am discussing Zimmerman's case and the new developments that he lied about income to the court.

Isn't there some code of ethics that your bound to with your online psych degree? Don't you think it's time to just acknowledge the elephant in the room and cut out the nonsense already? Honestly "Waterboy", it's concerning that you would create another identity to post under. I think you recall some past members doing the same thing, and people were very concerned about their mental well being.
 
Then don't ask off topic questions. No, I don't join in with all this silly stuff.

So, what about Zimmerman lying about the money he had in the bank and claiming to be indigent? What do you think about that?

I don't think anything about it because I'm not following it. I have my own life to live.
 
Isn't there some code of ethics that your bound to with your online psych degree? Don't you think it's time to just acknowledge the elephant in the room and cut out the nonsense already? Honestly "Waterboy", it's concerning that you would create another identity to post under. I think you recall some past members doing the same thing, and people were very concerned about their mental well being.

What are you talking about?
 
I don't think anything about it because I'm not following it. I have my own life to live.

Okay. Fair enough. Then why did you decide to post in a topic about Zimmerman and the Trayvon Martin case?
 
Okay. Fair enough. Then why did you decide to post in a topic about Zimmerman and the Trayvon Martin case?

Because I felt like trolling you just like you like to troll people that get on your nerves. :wave:
 
Those questions have been answered. And you haven't asked a question that hasn't been answered, either.

But how do you feel about Zimmerman signing a sworn statement saying he had no income or assests and was indigent, but really had $204,000 in a bank account he wasn't telling anyone about?

My question is at Post #350

Please direct me and all AD members to your answer to post #109, thank you.
 
My question is at Post #350

Please direct me and all AD members to your answer to post #109, thank you.

Answer to question in post 109 is in post 111 and post 116. Very clear.

Answer to question in post 350 in post 353.
 
I don't think he will be acquited, and there is nothing to prove that there will be a riot if he is. But if he is looking for an acquital, he is going about it the wrong way by lying to the court. Doesn't say much for his story being believable.

I don't riot. Never have, never will. But what about Zimmerman lying about not having any income or assets?

He didn't lie. But, you do.
 
He didn't lie. But, you do.

Oh? What do you call signing a sworn statement saying you have no money and no income and are indigent when you have 204,000 dollars in the bank and are using it to pay rent and other stuff? It sure isn't telling the truth.
 
Isn't there some code of ethics that your bound to with your online psych degree? Don't you think it's time to just acknowledge the elephant in the room and cut out the nonsense already? Honestly "Waterboy", it's concerning that you would create another identity to post under. I think you recall some past members doing the same thing, and people were very concerned about their mental well being.

So if that's the case, shouldn't we have compassion?

Completely ignore it and give no response, and it will stop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top