Might not be a popular opinion, but as an oral hoh person -- if I had a hoh child - I would personally encourage speech to a limit. My parents encouraged speech before ASL. Everyone is going to be in different situations, but I am comfortable enough to use speech as my main communication method right now even if I miss a lot context at times. It wasn't easy - I can be self conscious about my speech and I'm aware the I'm miss out on some things. But I don't think I would "escape" any issues by turning to ASL. The challenges would still be there - just maybe different. I may need an interpreter, maybe people would be less likely to approach me (just speculating here, this could be false). As an oral person - my challenges relate more to if people understand me and if I understand them speaking and did I miss any information. I'm used to it and I know what information is important to pursue and what stuff to let go. I have an awesome group of friends/family who understand my situation. When I do miss out on stuff, there are ways around this - methods very similar to someone who uses ASL would use - email, text, notes, etc.
So to reiterate - I would encourage speech for deaf/hoh kids with ASL until the child had a strong preference. I'm fine if the kid chose ASL over speech, but I would always leave speech therapy as an option on the table. If the kid was deaf - I'd be way less inclined to advocate for speech therapy until the kid showed interest or random proficiency.
If the person is an adult - do whatever makes you happy. You have no obligation to follow rules or preferences of those around you or what you did in the past - use ASL if that is what you want. I just don't think ASL is the only answer for HOH folks. I'm content with how my life played out and I know that have the freedom to change that (go voice only, ASL, whatever) if I wanted.
I guess this was a long answer when all I need to say was that I agree with Bottesini.