X360 & PS3 are equal

Get Xbox360 with Xbox live and we'll go on afew matches, then I'll accept ur apology. ;)
 
Did anyone get PS3? eBay went more than 1,000 dollars on PS3, damn...
 
Here's a interesting read from a GameFAQs.com thread.
*********

Ok, so incrediblistic said: "As for the processing power breakdown by SirNathaniel; I'm not going to argue numbers. If you truly believe that the 360 is more powerful than the PS3 than explain to me why the first generation of 360 games looked like Xbox 1.5 games while PS3 games look very close to second generation 360 games? Don't believe me? Take a look at a screenshot of Perfect Dark Zero and then look at Resistence: Fall of Man or Heavenly Sword."

So you simply compare ps3's launch titles that have been in development for a longer time for that particular system than pdz and other 360 launch titles were dveloped for the 360, so OF COURSE we're seeing a big difference right now, especially with pdz. PDZ was origianlly being developed for gamecube, then MS comes in and buys Rare, makes them start working on it for xbox, cnacels it and makes them do a rush job on a 360 version. Did you not know that most 360 launch titles were launched? Not to mention none of them were given new engins such as unreal engine 3, like how the ps3 launch titles have been given such engines. I may be an xbox fan, but even I think microsoft was retarded to not give their developers devkits and good graphics engines earlier. Why not compare R:FOM to call of Duty 2's graphics eh? pretty close there. Not to mention ps3's launch titles have had an extra year to be developed, uprgaded, etc. therefore ps3 launch titles realy have no excuse to not look as good as they are, thats just the truth.

On top of all that, what does it matter that the 360 launch titles looked like "xbox 1.5" as you said? It means absolutely nothing about the system's power, the developers had no way at the time to take advantage of that power. But now...look at Gears of War and other new titles such as those being produced by Ubisoft and other great developers that have been working fastest at learning the power of the systems. Epic, which is a multiplatform developer has stated that Gears of War is not possible on the ps3:

"Since Epic is working with the PS3 hardware and the Xbox 360 hardware could Gears of War ever work on the Playstation 3? “256 MB of RAM makes a huge difference. There is no way we could ever do Gears of War on 256, we had trouble fitting everything on 512MB. We pushed the 360 to the limits.” Another member from Epic’s team chimed in with the fact that there are currently more Playstation 3 programmers than Xbox 360 programmers. 'It (the PS3) is in our future. We always had plans for the Playstation 3 and an engine already runs on it.'" http://www.silic Online gaming war:
XBL ($50 per13months) vs. Ps3 Online (free)
XBL is way ahead as we all know it, and in the long run, is not only free, but save you more money than you spend on it:
Xbox live diamond card- free to all users of xbox live- this program gives you far more than enough discounts to make up for the yearly $50 payment for xbox live over and over- NOT ONLY DOES THIS MAKE XBOX LIVE FREE, BUT MAKES THE SERVICE SAVE YOU MONEY! For example: offers such as $20 off of theme park visits, rent 1 rent another free at movie gallery, save 10% on any target.com purchase…the list goes on forever!
 
perfect-dark-zero-1.jpg


resistance-fall-of-man_1147160204.jpg


uh, two screenshots from two different games still look identical to me...

whatever to gamefaqs.com. (must be another PS fanboy...)
 
Steel X said:
Ah really? okay.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't need your accept for apology and whatever about you believe with other people.

I'm going to re-join xbox live with new account and would do it in Jan 2007. I need get game adapter from Linksys and it wasn't work with official MS network adapter because of NAT. I'm tired of NAT to called "moderate" or "strict" and it was "strict" at most time.
Linksys - 802.11a/g Wireless Gaming Adapter - WGA54AG

I don't care about VP but I already updated the fireware on Linksys to make official MS network adapter to work with NAT with "open" instead of "moderate" or "strict".
 
Dr. Strangelove said:
Here's a interesting read from a GameFAQs.com thread.
*********

Ok, so incrediblistic said: "As for the processing power breakdown by SirNathaniel; I'm not going to argue numbers. If you truly believe that the 360 is more powerful than the PS3 than explain to me why the first generation of 360 games looked like Xbox 1.5 games while PS3 games look very close to second generation 360 games? Don't believe me? Take a look at a screenshot of Perfect Dark Zero and then look at Resistence: Fall of Man or Heavenly Sword."

So you simply compare ps3's launch titles that have been in development for a longer time for that particular system than pdz and other 360 launch titles were dveloped for the 360, so OF COURSE we're seeing a big difference right now, especially with pdz. PDZ was origianlly being developed for gamecube, then MS comes in and buys Rare, makes them start working on it for xbox, cnacels it and makes them do a rush job on a 360 version. Did you not know that most 360 launch titles were launched? Not to mention none of them were given new engins such as unreal engine 3, like how the ps3 launch titles have been given such engines. I may be an xbox fan, but even I think microsoft was retarded to not give their developers devkits and good graphics engines earlier. Why not compare R:FOM to call of Duty 2's graphics eh? pretty close there. Not to mention ps3's launch titles have had an extra year to be developed, uprgaded, etc. therefore ps3 launch titles realy have no excuse to not look as good as they are, thats just the truth.

On top of all that, what does it matter that the 360 launch titles looked like "xbox 1.5" as you said? It means absolutely nothing about the system's power, the developers had no way at the time to take advantage of that power. But now...look at Gears of War and other new titles such as those being produced by Ubisoft and other great developers that have been working fastest at learning the power of the systems. Epic, which is a multiplatform developer has stated that Gears of War is not possible on the ps3:

"Since Epic is working with the PS3 hardware and the Xbox 360 hardware could Gears of War ever work on the Playstation 3? “256 MB of RAM makes a huge difference. There is no way we could ever do Gears of War on 256, we had trouble fitting everything on 512MB. We pushed the 360 to the limits.” Another member from Epic’s team chimed in with the fact that there are currently more Playstation 3 programmers than Xbox 360 programmers. 'It (the PS3) is in our future. We always had plans for the Playstation 3 and an engine already runs on it.'" http://www.silic Online gaming war:
XBL ($50 per13months) vs. Ps3 Online (free)
XBL is way ahead as we all know it, and in the long run, is not only free, but save you more money than you spend on it:
Xbox live diamond card- free to all users of xbox live- this program gives you far more than enough discounts to make up for the yearly $50 payment for xbox live over and over- NOT ONLY DOES THIS MAKE XBOX LIVE FREE, BUT MAKES THE SERVICE SAVE YOU MONEY! For example: offers such as $20 off of theme park visits, rent 1 rent another free at movie gallery, save 10% on any target.com purchase…the list goes on forever!
Click to expand...

I read this from beginning to finish and it's pro-X360. Are you changing your mind, Doctor Strangelove?
 
Not changing my mind, but keeping it open. Up until I read that peice I thought the PS3 was far superior to the 360. But it appears like you or someone else said, that the 360 has better strings holding it togother while the PS3 may be overly complicated.
And it seems from what I copied and pasted above that Gears Of War can't be on PS3 due to RAM.
Keeping it open, not changing my mind. I still feel the PS3 will come out as the superior system after 2 years.
 
It's always cool with me when gamers keeps an open mind. Nobody stays on the top..

Nintendo lost their hill to Sony because they stuck to cartridges and it looks like Sony might lose it to Microsoft because they're making developers work through a maze. The same idea crippled the Sega Saturn.
 
Pacman said:
Where's proof?
Click to expand...

Cmon...it's obvious.

If you know math, then you would understand it more perfectly.

5,000 PS3 nation wide and 4 million Wiis nationwide...who gets the most on lauch? With an even bigger number you know who obviously will win on launch.
 
Fragmenter said:
It's always cool with me when gamers keeps an open mind. Nobody stays on the top..

Nintendo lost their hill to Sony because they stuck to cartridges and it looks like Sony might lose it to Microsoft because they're making developers work through a maze. The same idea crippled the Sega Saturn.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Thats what I heard on EGM magazine like in late september or early october with the developers who created Call of Duty 3 for the PS3 and Wii versions and they said they had much harder time producing the game on PS3 than with Wii because of complicated hardware like the cell processor and as for Wii is MUCH easier for them to get thru since its less complicated and is similar to the gamecube hardware.
 
Steel X said:
Cmon...it's obvious.

If you know math, then you would understand it more perfectly.

5,000 PS3 nation wide and 4 million Wiis nationwide...who gets the most on lauch? With an even bigger number you know who obviously will win on launch.
Click to expand...

5,000???

Where did you get that information?

Really Sony will release least 400,000 in North America is USA and Canada.

That's what Sony announced that. WII is really plenty of fishes in North America. We will not have to worry about WII.

Same for xbox 360 launch day was 300,000.
 
sjones4dad said:
5,000???

Where did you get that information?

Really Sony will release least 400,000 in North America is USA and Canada.

That's what Sony announced that. WII is really plenty of fishes in North America. We will not have to worry about WII.

Same for xbox 360 launch day was 300,000.
Click to expand...

Did I say 5,000? I mean 500,000. Sorry alittle miscaluation.
 
Steel X said:
Cmon...it's obvious.

If you know math, then you would understand it more perfectly.

5,000 PS3 nation wide and 4 million Wiis nationwide...who gets the most on lauch? With an even bigger number you know who obviously will win on launch.
Click to expand...

You are full of BS.

I know that electronic stores that sell about 30 PS3 or more but depends on area.

Supplies for 360 is almost same as PS3 due launch day.
 
sjones4dad said:
5,000???

Where did you get that information?

Really Sony will release least 400,000 in North America is USA and Canada.

That's what Sony announced that. WII is really plenty of fishes in North America. We will not have to worry about WII.

Same for xbox 360 launch day was 300,000.
Click to expand...

Yea, I remember about it.
 
Pacman said:
You are full of BS.

I know that electronic stores that sell about 30 PS3 or more but depends on area.

Supplies for 360 is almost same as PS3 due launch day.
Click to expand...

full of BS?

wow, I appericate the name calling...*sigh* yet you are so naive...I'll have to let you see that with your own eyes anyway.

As for PS3...the cat's outta the bag. some places are ALREADY selling the PS3s. (and you know its true.)

What? need another proof, pacman? okay here you go. :roll: go to GameSpot:Video Games PC PlayStation 2 Xbox 360 Wii PS3 GameCube PSP DS GBA PS2 PlayStation 3 and you'll find the news there.

Even some ppl are lining up and camping a week early for the PS3 lol...how pathetic.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top