posts from hell
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2004
- Messages
- 9,371
- Reaction score
- 10
Hmm.. Guess I am not as affected.
Fire is symbolic...... for both a painful, vengeful end and purifying.
As opposed to throwing it into a sewer pond?
Fire is also a more public and visible action, and usually a group activity.
Really? Don't you think that it has a lot to do with WHAT is being destroyed or desecrated? I cerntianly do. How can just "the act" be be considered offensive?it's the act of destroying and desecrating it in any manner that makes it offensive.
they can simply step on it or urinate on it.
Or as opposed to flying pigs dropping beer kegs over the Mideast.....*slinking away.....*
I only included the section of your quote that I disagreed with. I agree with the remainder and omitting the rest doesn't render anything void. You said it has nothing to do with political correctness and my response was that it does have to do with political correctness which is supported further in the article itself.Wirelessly posted
Nice way of omitting the rest of the quote, rendering the first sentence void.
I only included the section of your quote that I disagreed with. I agree with the remainder and omitting the rest doesn't render anything void. You said it has nothing to do with political correctness and my response was that it does have to do with political correctness which is supported further in the article itself.
Wirelessly posted
Where I live, they wouldn't be a minority-- Christians are 40 percent, and non-religious is around 30 percent.
Don't atheists choose to burn the Bible over other equally-valid texts because it's representative of North America's largest religion?
Have you ever broken up with a bf/gf and burned their pictures?