- Joined
- Jan 16, 2004
- Messages
- 10,305
- Reaction score
- 0
you still haven't answered my question yet. What do you prefer? Clinton's scandal or Bush's scandal?
To answer to your question : Nada.
you still haven't answered my question yet. What do you prefer? Clinton's scandal or Bush's scandal?
That's where you got it wrong.
" Both of them ( Clintons ) have bad scandals in the past. "
AllDeaf.com - View Single Post - Where's the Love???
I talked about BOTH of THEM, not just Bill.
please refresh my memory. what scandals were they (beside sex scandal)?
Why should I refresh your memory ? I am sure you knew what their scandals were. I will give you 2 things for example but, there were alot more.
* Whitewater Affair
* Vince Foster Murder Case
And, will you please tell me WHY Obama has to choose Hillary and befriends with Bill Clinton ? Obama knew that Bill Clinton was a corrupted President and that both of his wife, Hillary and Bill himself have bad scandals in history. Tell me why ?
Why should I refresh your memory ? I am sure you knew what their scandals were. I will give you 2 things for example but, there were alot more.
* Whitewater Affair
* Vince Foster Murder Case
And, will you please tell me WHY Obama has to choose Hillary and befriends with Bill Clinton ? Obama knew that Bill Clinton was a corrupted President and that both of his wife, Hillary and Bill himself have bad scandals in history. Tell me why ?
And, will you please tell me WHY Obama has to choose Hillary and befriends with Bill Clinton ? Obama knew that Bill Clinton was a corrupted President and that both of his wife, Hillary and Bill himself have bad scandals in history. Tell me why ?
Cause they were horny.
We're all humans. So what.
Hillary is a powerful woman, she had been the first lady, and a senator, she visited over 80 countries, she would do everything whatever it takes to help. I know she'll do very good..
Hillary never done anything wrong, why are you making her out as a bad person because of her husband's past action?
I know. It's just that I read alot about him, his background, his goals and decisions, and all. I don't think that he is goin' to be the best president. - IMO.
Good post. Thank you for such a wonderful post about Hillary Clinton.
I just know that I would not want to be anyone to be my judge, jury and executioner based on "association actions" so imagine what Obama is going through.
Hillary is a powerful woman, she had been the first lady, and a senator, she visited over 80 countries, she would do everything whatever it takes to help. I know she'll do very good..
Hillary never done anything wrong, why are you making her out as a bad person because of her husband's past action?
Because Obama has nothing do with Clinton couple´s past.
We all make mistakes, don´t we?
Maria is scared that USA will be the most wealthy country for all middle classes. She's scared that we'll live the American Dream.
So, therefore Obama WILL make mistakes, too. Will it be alright with you if, Obama abuses his power and, even thou if he makes a mistake ? We will see about that after Jan. 20th.
Hot Air » Blog Archive » CNN: Bush not snubbed after allCredit CNN for stomping on their own Rick Sanchez, who reported that George Bush had … “cooties” at the G20 meeting. It turns out that Sanchez didn’t bother to actually check out the details of the reception, which Jeanne Moos did after Sanchez’ report went viral yesterday:
Bush didn’t get snubbed at all, it turns out. He had already greeted most of these leaders, including a number of photo ops that Moos includes in this report. The handshakes we see in Sanchez’ clip occurred with leaders who had not already met for a grip-and-grin before the group shot.
Hey, even Angela Merkel posed with Bush and smiled while he grabbed her hand … and only her hand. Silvio Berlusconi held Bush’s hand as they strolled off the dais. Everyone seemed cheery around Bush, even with the economy diving into a teacup this week.
So where does this leave Rick Sanchez? How does a show host recover from having his own network rip apart his reporting as puerile and uninformed? Move to MS-NBC, where those qualities have value?
CNN Corrects Its Pathetic 'Bush Snubbed By World Leaders' Story | NewsBusters.orgCNN Corrects Its Pathetic 'Bush Snubbed By World Leaders' Story
By Noel Sheppard
November 22, 2008 - 14:45 ET
CNN has corrected a bogus story the network's Rick Sanchez pathetically aired Wednesday about leaders at last Saturday's G20 meeting snubbing President Bush as if he had "cooties."
For those that missed it, Sanchez played a video of Bush seemingly being ignored by most of the leaders of the free world as they lined up to take a group picture:
"I want you to look at this video, all right. It seems almost sad. Look at this. This is the president of the United States walking out on stage to take a picture with world leaders invited to the G20 summit over the weekend. Look at him. And he seems like the most unpopular kid in high school that nobody liked -- you know, the one with the cooties? "
Actually, what seems sad, Rick, is that as your colleague Jeanne Moos reported Friday, you didn't know what you were talking about.
JEANNE MOOS, CNN NATIONAL NEWS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): This is the story of the snub that wasn't. Take one unpopular American president hosting a summit. Surround him with world leaders shaking hands with everyone but him. Next thing you know it's the diss heard around the blogosphere, link back to CNN.
RICK SANCHEZ, CNN ANCHOR: I want you to look at this video, all right? It seems almost sad.
MOOS: "The Daily Show" played it. It's the show closing moment of Zen. The White House probably wasn't feeling so Zen when it heard interpretations like this.
VOICE OF SANCHEZ: And he seems like the most unpopular kid in high school that nobody liked. You know, the one with cooties.
MOOS: Cooties? You can't shrug off cooties.
GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: How are you doing?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Thank you very much.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Good morning.
BUSH: How are you doing?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I'm fine. Thank you.
MOOS: It turns out the president had already shaken everybody's hand earlier that same day. In fact, he had shaken most of their hands twice starting the day before. Responding to the where's the love perceived snub, the White House noted the president had already greeted all of those leaders prior to this picture, whereas the other leaders had not had the opportunity to greet each other yet that morning.
(on camera): When it comes to diplomatic protocol there is one unshakeable rule, shake hands no matter how much you like or dislike a leader, unless you're outright enemies.
(voice-over): The snub that wasn't occurred as the leaders were lining up for a group photo. They took the picture and they had to turn around and do it again, because Argentina's first female president arrived late. Oops. Take two.
Despite the snubber-in-chief talk, there was plenty of back slapping and patting at the summit. As for likening the president to --
SANCHEZ: The one with the cooties
MOOS: Tell that to Italy's prime minister. He and President Bush palled around like a couple of old coots.
Jeanne Moos, CNN, New York.
Kudos to Moos for exposing her colleague as the boob we all know him to be. However, it would be nice if all the leftwing websites that gleefully posted Sanchez's report (video embedded below) -- including the Huffington Post -- would publish a retraction.
Don't hold your breath.
Tsk. I'm no Bush lover but the other leaders showed poor diplomacy and statemanship by refusing to shake the hand of the representative of the United States of America. Duly noted.
So, therefore Obama WILL make mistakes, too. Will it be alright with you if, Obama abuses his power and, even thou if he makes a mistake ? We will see about that after Jan. 20th.
Have you researched in her history what she did to our country when her husband was a president at that time ?
Okay. It's good that you're being informative about Obama's backgrounds, visions, goals, so and on.
We may not know if Obama will be the best president or not. He has a lot on his plate and he knows that.
My point is, Why should we make any quick assumptions to make a judgment to say that Obama will not be the best president or so? Only, in time we will tell.
This is what happens every time we go into each election season. We see 2 oppositing parties that says one thing or another. Politicians are known to flip flop on things they've said through the campaign. So, does that mean we are too quick to say we can trust this person who is campaigning? No. It just means that we happen to support one side or another and hope for the best.
Every President has his own flaws. They are not perfect. It does not mean that they are better than one another.