Maybe it is just me...but don't some of your deaf people talk way too much about personal things? Such as details of their bowel movements? "Oh, man. That was a good poop I just had...I feel so better once it passed through my rectum!" Details of their sex (or sexless) lives? And some ask personal questions like - "So - did you two have sex on your date?" "How much money do you make?"
I think there's a fine line between being culturally deaf whereas things are open & straightforward - and just plain rudeness.
That rarely happens around me, but I have noticed that they "talk too much" on other things.
For instance, if we're in a meeting and discussing something... they will repeat everything.
It's more appropriate to bring up something that hasn't been brought up yet. If there was a discussion on a proposal and people were discussing PROs and CONs, then we only need to hear something new once. If what you want to say is what someone else already said, then there's no need to say it. However, in a deaf meeting... everyone has to... I mean... HAS TOO... say something even if it's already been said before.
Proposal: I move for the club to pay $100 for more paper.
Speaker: Let's make a PROs & CONs list.
Person 1: I agree because we have 100 sheets left.
Person 2: I disagree because we have 10 weeks left and only use an average of 5 sheets a week. We have enough.
Person 3: I agree because we are running out of paper.
Person 4: I agree with Person 1 because we have 100 sheets left.
Person 5: I disagree because we usually do our printouts at the computer lab and their printing is free.
Person 6: I agree because we need more supplies.
Person 7: I think we should pass this proposal because 4 people stated 4 good PROs.
Person 8: *thinking the same as Person 2* *says nothing*
Person 9: Since we have 5 PROs and 2 CONs, it's obvious that the PROs outweight the CONs. Let's close this discussion and vote!
Notice that Person 2, Person 5, and Person 8 did it the right way? Unfortunately, the motion was passed because the deaf members considered 5 statements as 5 separate PROs and felt that it was worth spending $100 on more paper.
Oh yeah, did I mention... this group went broke and had no more money for the rest of the year? The year ended and they hadn't even touched any of the paper they bought. :roll:
I've worked at a Parliamentarian for a group before and have often had people ignore me because I was doing it the wrong way. They believed they were doing it the right way because a videotape told them so. Unfortunately, I saw the videotape and they misunderstood the video.