I'm sure there are people without CI that have been hurt as well.....
That there is a risk does not mean you should not do it....
:roll: Big fat whopping hairy deal! You win some and lose some. There are always trade offs in life. I much prefer to hear to worry about "losing" something that wasn't doing me much good anyway.
As neecy said, I have no idea why people think that keeping one's residual hearing is important.
Being a mum, balloons are a big part of my life (!), haven't had any problems with them so far but if I do, I'll go to the clinic to get the programs reloaded.
!
i have another question that i didn't bring up with my friend. so what if i want to ride a roller coaster with OTS (over-the-shoulder) restraints? sometimes if it's a bumpy coaster, you bang your head on the sides of the restraint. i ALWAYS take off my BTE before i go on these rides anyway. but like, if i bonked the side of my head even with the CI removed, would that be bad?
I n
I
I went to Airport and gave TSA my CI processor to inspect (he swabbed and put swab in detection machine and show up clean LOL) and I walked through metal detector and picked up my processor after that.. BUT when I was at Bradley Airport (Hartford CT). One TSA was mad at me for removing processor. He scolded me to leave it on and walk through metal detector. I explained that my Audiologist told me NOT to walk though metal detector WHILE wearing PROCESSOR!! He insist but I insist not to. I told him that it'll wipe out program. I'm sticking what my Audiologist says! Sorry!! He had a cold stare at me and I walked away... This was one of those stupid guy I've encoutered. I don't care if they jump or tasered on me just for refusing to leave processor on. They should respect my wish (I've never had problem at other airports). If you don't agree with me, sorry, I'm just being toughie.
Thanks
Catty
That's something that everyone should do. There are some people who have CI that absolutely have to have it on at all times. CIs are like hearing aids... they should be worn when necessary. Sometimes, other things are more important than having to hear.I think I rode every roller coaster at Disneyland, California Screamer is one of my favorites. I just remove the processor, you will natually try to control your head on something like that so the possiblity of doing damage is pretty low I would think. I refuse to let an implant restict my fun on roller coasters....LOL
QFThahaha of course you can play soccer. i have a ci and i have been contacted by some division one programs. Nothing can hold you back except yourself.
The same thing goes for sleeping. If you're sleeping, why do you need to wake up? Oh, can't hear the alarm clock? Well, which would you rather do... spend $50 on a vibrating alarm clock or $5,000 to fix the CI that you accidentally broke cuz you decided to sleep with it?
The same thing goes for sleeping. If you're sleeping, why do you need to wake up? Oh, can't hear the alarm clock? Well, which would you rather do... spend $50 on a vibrating alarm clock or $5,000 to fix the CI that you accidentally broke cuz you decided to sleep with it?
That's a typical excuse for anyone who has to sleep with their hearing aids (or CI).Someone I know wears his CI EVERY NIGHT to bed. He says he cannot NOT wear it. He HAS to hear his bed alarm. I have tried sleeping with the CI on (a nap), and it was just uncomfortable and the coil keeps popping off, and after about 10 mins, my head hurts from the pressure of sleeping on it (I sleep on my left side). So, yeah...
Besides, if I'm worried about burglars or sounds in the house..that's what my hearing boyfriend is for. LOL.
:roll: Big fat whopping hairy deal! You win some and lose some. There are always trade offs in life. I much prefer to hear to worry about "losing" something that wasn't doing me much good anyway.
As neecy said, I have no idea why people think that keeping one's residual hearing is important.
Not if you want the dam thing out. When it goes all residual hearing goes. Bye, bye.
But the point is still moot if there was not enough residual hearing in the first place to be of any benefit! Even if I were to want to have my CI removed (which will never happen) the residual hearing I had was giving me NO benefit whatsoever, so I'd be no worse off than I was before I got my CI.
But the point is still moot if there was not enough residual hearing in the first place to be of any benefit! Even if I were to want to have my CI removed (which will never happen) the residual hearing I had was giving me NO benefit whatsoever, so I'd be no worse off than I was before I got my CI.