What if there was a serial killer....

dereksbicycles said:
We've heard enough and gave enough attention to serial killers. I don't want to add to it. The less stories about serial killers, the better.
Click to expand...
Good point. Many serial killers thrive on the notoriety. They keep scrapbooks of the stories about their crimes.
 
Not to contrdictu you, sorry. Butin foresics a victim profile is consiser by the higher the risk. All those i mention are the once at higher risk of been vitims of a killer than anyone else, thays why they are high profile voctims. You may conaosder this people to be low profile in a sense that sadly they are the less noticable. Celebrities re cosider either medium or low risk, in sare cases high and for the reason above. Most have security with them.
 
Dreamer03 said:
Not to contrdictu you, sorry. Butin foresics a victim profile is consiser by the higher the risk. All those i mention are the once at higher risk of been vitims of a killer than anyone else, thays why they are high profile voctims. You may conaosder this people to be low profile in a sense that sadly they are the less noticable. Celebrities re cosider either medium or low risk, in sare cases high and for the reason above. Most have security with them.
Click to expand...
And there you have your answer as to who is the culprit. When they are getting their drugs and so on either their security is involved or not. I would be looking hard at that element of the scenario for the story line.
 
Dreamer03 said:
Not to contrdictu you, sorry. Butin foresics a victim profile is consiser by the higher the risk. All those i mention are the once at higher risk of been vitims of a killer than anyone else, thays why they are high profile voctims. You may conaosder this people to be low profile in a sense that sadly they are the less noticable. Celebrities re cosider either medium or low risk, in sare cases high and for the reason above. Most have security with them.
Click to expand...
High profile and high risk are two totally different categories. A person can be high profile and low risk or low profile and high risk. You kept calling them "high profile" not "high risk." This is the first of your posts that differentiated profile and risk.

Victim or suspect profiling by a forensics team has nothing to do with how society defines a person as high or low profile. They are totally different definitions and criteria.

It's not what I "consider;" it's factual definition. Personally, I don't consider the death of a celebrity any more tragic than the death of an unknown simply by virtue of their celebrity status.
 
dereksbicycles said:
We've heard enough and gave enough attention to serial killers. I don't want to add to it. The less stories about serial killers, the better.
Click to expand...

Yeah most people end up remembering the serial killers names and not their victims name. And that is so wrong.
 
That is true, it is sad that victims are usually not remembered. I will agree to disagree with Reba. Sorry, again it seriously not to sound mean or anything sorry if i sounded disrespectful to you in any way. I also have to say that its truw, serial killers ar talked about too much, instead people should be taught how to detect a person who could possibly be one. But then that could lead into other issues...
 
There is a big problem. They do not advertise who they are. The ones caught up here had people completely fooled. Their wives or girlfriends no idea. Without a conscience apparently it is easy to lie and jam around leading a couple of lives doing the most reprehensible things. They are the lowest of the low.
 
Well anything is possible .. if CIA can kill 6 million people without us knowing. Who is to say they didnt practice on us and then as experts go and kill high ranking people around world. Who are hard people to kill? Famous people are one of em.. where else get real practice??
Just saying...
 
SilentRider said:
Well anything is possible .. if CIA can kill 6 million people without us knowing. Who is to say they didnt practice on us and then as experts go and kill high ranking people around world. Who are hard people to kill? Famous people are one of em.. where else get real practice??
Just saying...
Click to expand...
What 6 million people did the CIA kill? And if they did it "without us knowing" how is that you know about it?
 
I personally wouldn't believe it.... but people are pulled into lots of random thoughts now a days. It's believable they die after "escaping" rehab because most people are in there resisting because they're forced. When they finally escape, they have the funds to go get messed up and they over do it. I work very close here with Boley mental health centers and have a friend that works there. Boley specializes in mental health treatment for people who are also addicts. Can't tell you how many times we discharge them and see them back a month or so later. It's a vicious believable cycle. :(
 
There is maybe a thing that happens with trying having success and then failing with the whole world watching.
Most of us do our battles and only the people close to us know what is going on and that is plenty bad enough them seeing what they see.

It is a rare person that beats difficult addictions the first try and many try their best over and over and just don't make it.

For those who get addicted to them, drugs and alcohol are serial killers.
 
The setting is in the thirties before WW2 there is a train wreck out in the countryside of the Willamette Valley, two trains collide due to a failure to switch tracks at the junction in Roseburg. A deaf young farmhand working in a woodlot splitting shakes is within sight of the horrible crash. He realizes one is the northbound passenger train and the other is a south bound log train as he is running towards the crash to see who he can help...
 
Back
Top