Tousi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 18,461
- Reaction score
- 184
I would not say Sorenson is greedy; this is the American way of business. Sorenson is a big company and has capital (money) from their other businesses. So they can well afford to fund this VRS campaign to petition the FCC. This petition helps ALL VRS companies and they all get the same money from the FCC and they are ALL regulated by the FCC. The real question is: How much money (rate plan) do they need to operate and survive? If the rate is cut too much, then some of the VRS companies would fail.....survival of the fittest......it is possible that there are too many VRS companies to serve the deaf population. If Sorenson fails/gets out of the VRS business, it would not hurt them as they are involved in a number of other activities. If any other VRS businesses fail, that's it cuz that's all they do.
Now the only thing left is your choice of VRS. Some deaf people do not choose Sorenson because they feel that Sorenson looks at deafness as a medical model rather than the cultural model (see the complaints/concerns at Gallaudet wherein Sorenson had put up 5 million dollars toward a new building.Some people are concerned that 3/4 of the space in this new building will house speech/hearing/research, etc and 1/4 toward deaf culture/ASL.
So you see, this goes on and on; the issues are not as simple as they seem.
Now the only thing left is your choice of VRS. Some deaf people do not choose Sorenson because they feel that Sorenson looks at deafness as a medical model rather than the cultural model (see the complaints/concerns at Gallaudet wherein Sorenson had put up 5 million dollars toward a new building.Some people are concerned that 3/4 of the space in this new building will house speech/hearing/research, etc and 1/4 toward deaf culture/ASL.
So you see, this goes on and on; the issues are not as simple as they seem.