unemployeee Canada

can't afford becaue expensive reason aware it sadly! job lose
I surprised same usa and Canada
 
They should look for job in west Texas. They're heavy high demand hiring. Seriously....
 
jjpcusr-hearing said:
Brits get the stereotypical American stiff upper lip when they see bad grammar. You may want to study some random texts that are in English with correct grammar - compartmentalize the grammar like I do.
Click to expand...

I doubt! I am translate native speak half on ASL that is why strusture reason

English Native half

O.0 someone anyone people have troubles bad fluents quality on weak on grammar or education!! I already know :lol:
 
rolling7 said:
If you have plenty of jobs in Canada then America will start giving the illegals a free bus ride to Canada and these illegals can get jobs that Canadians don't want.
Click to expand...
yup that is true, sometimes that is why on illegal is very sometimes pretty depend on many time heard i

Illegal Job loan Canada immigration, variety, I research!
 
We seriously thought that if our house plans fell through, then hubby wanted to go to Canada. Mainly for a change of everything. He is so dissatisfied with the US right now.
 
I'm in Canada and it really depends what part of Canada you are in.
I'm having trouble finding a job right now.
 
I would not want to find a job in Canada after I found out about higher bracket of tax rate is 48 percent compared to US 35 percent. I am in the 15 percent. Oh nOOOOO Canada!!
 
UNYTruthHunters said:
I would not want to find a job in Canada after I found out about higher bracket of tax rate is 48 percent compared to US 35 percent. I am in the 15 percent. Oh nOOOOO Canada!!
Click to expand...

How do you know , I am surprised on pretty increase on tax, on cause on! I notice on compare sometimes on Canada on

I research impossibles on Canada increase on tax rates on with US :hmm: not sure how on highly!!
 
UNYTruthHunters said:
I would not want to find a job in Canada after I found out about higher bracket of tax rate is 48 percent compared to US 35 percent. I am in the 15 percent. Oh nOOOOO Canada!!
Click to expand...

Back in old time, the tax bracket in US was 90% or so.
 
Foxrac said:
What are the income tax rates in Canada?

I think she is referring to combine of federal and providence.

It is depending on income and she doesn't have to pay rest of 48%.
Click to expand...

Ah, then if you are looking at various combined rates of federal plus provincial, then it should be compared to US federal plus state for the same tax bracket. To say one is 35 and the other is 48 is very misleading ;-).
 
As far as I can tell, America has never had an income tax as high as 90%.

...In 1894, with Democrat Grover Cleveland in the White House and Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, a federal income tax became law. The new tax, however, was very different from the Civil War income tax, which had exempted only the poor. The new one hit only the rich, imposing a 2% tax on incomes above $4,000. Less than 1% of American households in 1894 met that income threshold. Needless to say, the tax was attacked in court, in a 1895 test case called Pollack v. Farmers' Loan & Trust. The case turned on the definition of a "direct tax," which the Constitution requires to be apportioned equally among the states according to population, something obviously impossible with an income tax.


The court split 4-4 as to whether the new income tax was constitutional. One member of the court, Justice Howell Jackson of Tennessee, was absent because of illness (and died less than three months later). But with the case drawing enormous public attention, the court agreed to reargue it and Justice Jackson rose from his deathbed to hear it.


Jackson was known to favor the income tax and it was assumed that it would now be upheld 5-4. But one of the other justices switched his vote (the opinion is unsigned and we don't know by whom or why) and it was voted down 5-4.



The income tax was dead. But the pressure to tax the incomes of the largely untaxed rich only increased, especially as the Progressive wing of the Republican Party grew in strength under Theodore Roosevelt. By the time of the administration of President William Howard Taft (1909-13) the pressure was becoming overwhelming. One representative suggested simply repassing the 1894 tax bill and daring the Supreme Court to overturn it a second time.

That idea horrified Taft, who revered the court. He feared that it would weaken its position as the final arbiter of the Constitution. He came up with a brilliant, very lawyerly, alternative: He proposed a constitutional amendment to legalize a personal income tax, while meanwhile imposing a tax on corporate profits. In the early 20th century such a tax was, in effect, a tax on the rich. As the corporate income tax is technically an excise tax, there was no constitutional problem. Taft's solution was implemented and in 1913 the 16th Amendment was declared ratified, just as Taft was leaving office.


The new president, Woodrow Wilson, and the strongly Democratic Congress promptly passed a personal income tax. It kicked in at 1% on incomes above $3,000 (a comfortable upper middle-class income at the time) and reached 7% on incomes over $500,000. But there were many deductions, bringing the effective tax rates down sharply from the marginal ones—a feature of the tax system ever since.


Unfortunately the corporate income tax, originally intended as only a stopgap measure, was left in place unchanged. As a result, for the last 98 years we have had two completely separate and uncoordinated income taxes. It's a bit as if corporations were owned by Martians, otherwise untaxed, instead of by their very earthly—and taxed—stockholders.



This has had two deeply pernicious effects. One, it allowed the very rich to avoid taxes by playing the two systems against each other. When the top personal income tax rate soared to 75% in World War I, for instance, thousands of the rich simply incorporated their holdings in order to pay the much lower corporate tax rate.
There has since been a sort of evolutionary arms race, as tax lawyers and accountants came up with ever new ways to game the system, and Congress endlessly added to the tax code to forbid or regulate the new strategies. The income tax act of 1913 had been 14 pages long. The Revenue Act of 1942 was 208 pages long, 78% of them devoted to closing or defining loopholes. It has only gotten worse.
...
Click to expand...

John Steele Gordon: A Short History of the Income Tax - WSJ.com
 
Income taxes (requiring individuals to pay a percentage of their income to the government, often on a graduated scale) required the ability to retain extremely detailed records. Throughout most of history, keeping track of individual records would have been a logistical impossibility. Thus, the implementation of an income tax was not found until 1799 in Great Britain. The new tax, viewed as a temporary one, was needed to help the British raise money to fight the French forces led by Napoleon.
The U.S. government faced a similar dilemma during the War of 1812. Based on the British model, the U.S. government considered raising money for the war through an income tax. However, the war ended before the income tax was officially enacted.
The idea of creating an income tax resurfaced during the American Civil War. Again considered a temporary tax to raise money for a war, Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861 which instituted an income tax. However, there were so many problems with the details of the income tax law that income taxes were not collected until the law was revised the following year in the Tax Act of 1862. In addition to adding taxes on feathers, gunpowder, billiard tables, and leather, the Tax Act of 1862 specified that the income tax would require those that earned up to $10,000 to pay the government three percent of their income while those that made over $10,000 would pay five percent. Also notable was the inclusion of a $600 standard deductible. The income tax law was amended several times over the next few years and eventually fully repealed in 1872.
Click to expand...
History of Income Tax in the U.S.
 
Back
Top