Fuzzy - you said that after I made it explicitly clear i was discriminated not because of good speech skills but because of my deafness.
Whatever. Like you say, let's not bicker.
groaaan. yet it is you who can't put to rest.
DC - the whole thing started with Lucas who said if you have good speech skills you may have better chances at employment :
lucas #13
Your child's speech may not be up to par with someone who can hear well but if the job interview, when he is 20, is between two equally qualified people one of whom cannot speak at all who do you think is getting the job?
I said I agree,
and then enter you:
DeafCaroline #30
It was my deafness that concerned them, not my speech. and by the way, my speech is very good.
My point exactly, YOUR SPEECH IS GOOD.
Nobody complained about your speech b/c your speech happened to be good.
I am astonished you still can't get my point. As it is not about you not being hired because of being deaf, this is about your speech not being an issue in this.
I get it, i get it, I get! - you needed to be able to pick a phones, hear others in a meetings etc - but do you get MY pov????
doesn't look like.
well, one can always hope.
BTW I meant to say it at the start - congratulations on becoming self employed and being your own boss!
More power to you!!
( respectful bow )
Now, on totally different subject,
suppose there was you applying somewhere else where nobody minded deaf applicants,
and there was someone else applying with no speech,
guess who'd get chosen?
I can imagine how the conversation goes:
"Well, they are both quite skilled, it's just with this one it will be a bit easier to communicate, no?... "
"Weeelllll...... wouldn't that be discrimination?"
"Weeeellll, not really, because being able to communicate in this job efficiently is a requirement, hmm"
Fuzzy