shimo
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 319
- Reaction score
- 3
Yes, but the purpose of the song isn't to create good interpreting or translating skills.Translating/interpreting a song isn't the same as conversing in another language. It's not going to help someone put her own thoughts into sign during a live conversation.
The first levels of ASL learning should be language acquisition, not interpreting. Interpreting is a whole different skill set. In the interpreting world, song interpretation is a skill by itself that requires specialized training beyond the usual ITP. Not every interpreter, even those who are certified, is able to do song/theatrical interpreting. It's certainly not something for beginning sign students to tackle.
Ironically, in church interpreting, most beginners start with song interpretation. That's really something that should be learned later. I think the reason it's done that way is because songs can be prepared ahead of time and practiced. If someone more skilled has prepared the text and teaches it to the newbie, that's a little different. Frozen text presentation is not the same as interpreting.
My two cents.
It's just a way for hearing ASL students to practice faster word recall, and for the to demonstrate/record what they know so far so that the instructor can decide what to instruct the students on next.
I'm definitely not saying glossing a song is the best or only way to learn ASL, but I'm saying that songs help language learners be aware of how slow they are at recalling words.