Top Senate Dems have told me privately that Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing

Status
Not open for further replies.
kokonut

kokonut

New Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
16,006
Reaction score
1
EEEEeeeee!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDX46Y2w9a8&feature]YouTube - Who Are The Scarborough Seven?[/ame]

The CC on the main YouTube page, is, ehhh, you'd get about 70 to 80% accuracy if you have one person talking.

All this is rather telling if Democrats are telling Scarborough these things. Maybe that's why you he goes to a lot of golf games, parties, and trips? Dunno. But the whole “in over his head” meme isn’t only circulating among the Repubilcans but rather among top Democrats in Congress.

Veddy, veddy interesting....

I wonder if Scarborough will get fired after this one?



You can read here for some more info.
Video: Joe Scarborough Top Dem Senators Have been telling me, “Obama Has No Idea What He’s Doing” « Nice Deb
 
Perhaps these seven Democrats have visions of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for their next address...

Obvious to me that Obama is not going to repeat, so it makes sense for people in his own party to start laying out the electability feelers. I would really like to see a politician that drives down the middle. Extremes are not working.
 
kokonut said:
All this is rather telling if Democrats are telling Scarborough these things. Maybe that's why you he goes to a lot of golf games, parties, and trips? Dunno. But the whole “in over his head” meme isn’t only circulating among the Repubilcans but rather among top Democrats in Congress.
Click to expand...
That's a pretty big IF. :giggle:
 
So, you're saying Scarborough is lying on TV?
 
kokonut said:
So, you're saying Scarborough is lying on TV?
Click to expand...
Did you read what I wrote? Is this one of those inquizitions that you do on me?

For the record, IMHO, Obama is not doing a good job. Other Democrats are licking their chops to be the next candidate. They are not going to mail it in because Obama is not popular. They are going to step forward and try to win the nomination themselves. It has started already. I assume you watch the early stages of campaigns. Isn't this standard practice?
 
Let's dig a little deeper, shall we?

Democrats got their butts kicked last week. They are looking to win back the public. Since anything Obama has negative implications connected to it, these "secret seven" are stepping to the front (although secretly) to begin their campaigns. Seems pretty simple to me. They are jumping ship to further their own agendas. Feel free to write that up, how these Democrats are turncoats. I know you love any negative angle you can find. I offer you that statement for your next thread...:hmm:
 
kokonut said:
So, you're saying Scarborough is lying on TV?
Click to expand...

Another thing...since you consider all MSM as full of slanted news, why does this particular moment feel like the truth? Is it because it supports your personal agenda? Perhaps that is why you like FoxNews, since they have a much higher rate of Liberal-bashing reports.

Like a moth to the flame, MSNBC draws you deeper...:nana:
 
saywhatkid said:
Did you read what I wrote? Is this one of those inquizitions that you do on me?

For the record, IMHO, Obama is not doing a good job. Other Democrats are licking their chops to be the next candidate. They are not going to mail it in because Obama is not popular. They are going to step forward and try to win the nomination themselves. It has started already. I assume you watch the early stages of campaigns. Isn't this standard practice?
Click to expand...

Yes, I read what you wrote which is why I'm asking for clarification. What's with the "pretty big 'if' comment"?

The campaigning won't begin in earnest until next year. It's all speculation at this point to see how everything goes from the economy to O's performances in 2011 to see who will be the first ones out of the gate.
 
saywhatkid said:
Another thing...since you consider all MSM as full of slanted news, why does this particular moment feel like the truth? Is it because it supports your personal agenda? Perhaps that is why you like FoxNews, since they have a much higher rate of Liberal-bashing reports.

Like a moth to the flame, MSNBC draws you deeper...:nana:
Click to expand...

Do you even know who Scarborough is?
 
kokonut said:
Yes, I read what you wrote which is why I'm asking for clarification. What's with the "pretty big 'if' comment"?

The campaigning won't begin in earnest until next year. It's all speculation at this point to see how everything goes from the economy to O's performances in 2011 to see who will be the first ones out of the gate.
Click to expand...
You have an IF in there. I was just making note of it.

Campaigning started last Wednesday. I would estimate that at least 2 of these "secret seven" will announce an attempt for 2012.
 
hearie here

so sorry to interupt ur conversation but I cannot for the life of me figure out how to post my own question! can someone help me? Thanks:ty::ty:
 
saywhatkid said:
You have an IF in there. I was just making note of it.

Campaigning started last Wednesday. I would estimate that at least 2 of these "secret seven" will announce an attempt for 2012.
Click to expand...

And I'm making a note of your "big if." What's the deal with that?
 
kokonut said:
And I'm making a note of your "big if." What's the deal with that?
Click to expand...
You wrote: "All this is rather telling if Democrats are telling Scarborough these things."

Why have the word IF in there? IF expresses doubt, used the way it is. A better choice, given your intent, might have been to use "that" instead.

I am done with the Grammar Patrol. Back to the topic.
 
Sorry to interupt your convo but i can't figure out how to post my own question. Can you help me?
 
saywhatkid said:
You wrote: "All this is rather telling if Democrats are telling Scarborough these things."

Why have the word IF in there? IF expresses doubt, used the way it is. A better choice, given your intent, might have been to use "that" instead.

I am done with the Grammar Patrol. Back to the topic.
Click to expand...

Sure, although Scarborough paraphrased about some of the actual words Democrats have told him. He wasn't clear but the message he gave is that Democrats have told him and showed their deep discontent and disappointment about the President. That I don't doubt.

Now, again, what's up with the "big if" comment? Are you expressing some doubts that it never happened or what?
 
kokonut said:
Now, again, what's up with the "big if" comment? Are you expressing some doubts that it never happened or what?
Click to expand...
YOU used the word IF. Were you expressing doubt? Because that is what the word IF means when used in this context.

I have no idea whether or not Scarborough was told this information. I was not invited. He is an entertainer. He makes money by being famous. Do people make deceptive actions to increase their bankroll? :hmm:

Where is that facepalm GIF???
 
saywhatkid said:
YOU used the word IF. Were you expressing doubt? Because that is what the word IF means when used in this context.

I have no idea whether or not Scarborough was told this information. I was not invited. He is an entertainer. He makes money by being famous. Do people make deceptive actions to increase their bankroll? :hmm:

Where is that facepalm GIF???
Click to expand...

I already said, "Sure," he paraphrased stating their deep discontent. At least he appears to paraphrase in his explaination unless those were the actual words said to him word for word, "Obama doesn't know what's he's doing." If they said like that in that context, then that'd be quite telling. I already said I don't doubt their discontent.

Now, again, you said a "big IF," what's the deal with that? Are you doubting Scarborough's claim on what Dems told him? Or doubt that Dems in Congress didn't approach or talk to him? What?
 
33agl61.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top