Time Travel

Mann_K05 said:
:ty: for explaining and this link :)
It seemed good tv show to me through I am not big fan of star terk. I wonder, star terk is still running on or had been chancelled?
Click to expand...
Star Trek is no longer running.

They had 5 different series... 3 of them being related and 2 being spin-offs. The episode that I was talking about came from Star Trek: The Original Series (aka ST:TOS). ST:TOS ran for 3 years from 1966 to 1969.

If you're a member of Netflix or Blockbuster Online, I suggest you rent the eigth disc of the first season. They did release a special 4-disc set called Star Trek: Fan Collective - Time Travel. This episode is on the first disc. :)

You might as well rent the whole Star Trek: Fan Collective - Time Travel since the whole thing is related to time travel in the Star Trek series. :)
 
VamPyroX said:
Star Trek is no longer running.

They had 5 different series... 3 of them being related and 2 being spin-offs. The episode that I was talking about came from Star Trek: The Original Series (aka ST:TOS). ST:TOS ran for 3 years from 1966 to 1969.

If you're a member of Netflix or Blockbuster Online, I suggest you rent the eigth disc of the first season. They did release a special 4-disc set called Star Trek: Fan Collective - Time Travel. This episode is on the first disc. :)

You might as well rent the whole Star Trek: Fan Collective - Time Travel since the whole thing is related to time travel in the Star Trek series. :)
Click to expand...

Alright, thanks for that. ;)
 
Join with me in my secret time machine and have fun! :bump:


I m the one who ever had experience with time machine few times.
 
nah more like my dreamland cuz it didnt exist.. lol... :P mwahhahhaha
 
VamPyroX said:
Yes, that's another theory. If it happens, then it's meant to happen. There's no avoiding it. It's probably some unknown force in the universe that ensures that it will happen... no matter what.
Click to expand...

That theory is supported by Stephen Hawking's recent "Chronology Protection Conjecture" paper in which he suggests even if the curved universe theory and wormhole shortcuts prove viable to transport us to different time-streams, the laws of physics which seem to back up his time-arrow idea will most likely resist paradoxical time loops. So, as you say, going back to warn Lincoln to skip the play would save neither Abe nor John Wilkes.

I read Ray Bradbury's short story, "Sound of Thunder" in R is for Rocket when I was 11 or 12, and it hooked me forever on time-travel fiction and non-fiction.

What intriques me is even if time travel to our past is impossible due to all the physical tangles, past viewing is becoming feasible. In a way, we do it now.

Alpha Centauri C (Proxima) in the triple-star Alpha Centauri system is 4.2 light years away, meaning what we see there happened 4.2 years ago and vise-versa. Telescope technology coupled with faster-than-light ions may someday prove interesting.
 
Chase said:
That theory is supported by Stephen Hawking's recent "Chronology Protection Conjecture" paper in which he suggests even if the curved universe theory and wormhole shortcuts prove viable to transport us to different time-streams, the laws of physics which seem to back up his time-arrow idea will most likely resist paradoxical time loops. So, as you say, going back to warn Lincoln to skip the play would save neither Abe nor John Wilkes.

I read Ray Bradbury's short story, "Sound of Thunder" in R is for Rocket when I was 11 or 12, and it hooked me forever on time-travel fiction and non-fiction.

What intriques me is even if time travel to our past is impossible due to all the physical tangles, past viewing is becoming feasible. In a way, we do it now.

Alpha Centauri C (Proxima) in the triple-star Alpha Centauri system is 4.2 light years away, meaning what we see there happened 4.2 years ago and vise-versa. Telescope technology coupled with faster-than-light ions may someday prove interesting.
Click to expand...

Your words are very good.
 
We still curious how Darwin a theory of evolution since million years ago. Did God create us long time ago? Should we build that and join us in time machine for watching them?
 
Chase said:
That theory is supported by Stephen Hawking's recent "Chronology Protection Conjecture" paper in which he suggests even if the curved universe theory and wormhole shortcuts prove viable to transport us to different time-streams, the laws of physics which seem to back up his time-arrow idea will most likely resist paradoxical time loops. So, as you say, going back to warn Lincoln to skip the play would save neither Abe nor John Wilkes.

I read Ray Bradbury's short story, "Sound of Thunder" in R is for Rocket when I was 11 or 12, and it hooked me forever on time-travel fiction and non-fiction.

What intriques me is even if time travel to our past is impossible due to all the physical tangles, past viewing is becoming feasible. In a way, we do it now.

Alpha Centauri C (Proxima) in the triple-star Alpha Centauri system is 4.2 light years away, meaning what we see there happened 4.2 years ago and vise-versa. Telescope technology coupled with faster-than-light ions may someday prove interesting.
Click to expand...
I saw the movie... Sound of Thunder. Interesting time-travel concept.
 
Yeah, I saw that movie as well.

Also another movie, The Time Machine. But I haven't read the book which the film is based from. Did anyone here read that book?

I have read only one of his (H.G. Wells) books, "The War of the Worlds."
 
Silentwolfdog said:
Yeah, I saw that movie as well.

Also another movie, The Time Machine. But I haven't read the book which the film is based from. Did anyone here read that book?

I have read only one of his (H.G. Wells) books, "The War of the Worlds."
Click to expand...
Which movie... the old or new one?
 
Ah, the new one. Never saw the 1960 version. Wonder which one followed the book more closely.
 
Silentwolfdog said:
Ah, the new one. Never saw the 1960 version. Wonder which one followed the book more closely.
Click to expand...
I don't really know.

From what I heard, the 2002 version is more close to the book than the 1960 version.

Here's something interesting...

The director of the 2002 version was Simon Wells... the great-grandson of H.G. Wells, the author of the book of the same name. ;)

There is something that might have made the movie more interesting... if they had included the censored/uncut chapter from the book.
 
I saw a picture of morlocks for the 1960s version and the morlocks looked even more creepy.

I checked Amazon for that film and it stated that it was closed captioning and has subtitles as well. So dunno, I guess you can try renting the DVD version?

Now for some strange reason, I feel like I want to buy the book. I guess I am really curious.
 
Back
Top