I understand your intention. Let me rephrase this:
You could do that, but do it only to one person at a time... and not all at once. Why? Well, suppose you received something that was also sent to 49 other people. That's 50 people. 24 of them don't like it, including you. That's 25 people. A few days later, all reply saying they don't like it and wish for it to be stopped. The other 25 like the idea so they pass it on. Out of 50, 30 of them are your friends. That's 50 messages coming to you just because everyone wanted to tell everyone else to leave them alone. In my box, I got 3 messages from people continuing the chain mail. The other 47 were from people who were replying asking us to leave her alone. Apparently, they used the "reply to all" feature without paying attention. That's something you should consider.
on how it can be perceived as a "spam" if it was looked at as a personal messaging request -- if someone ignored my request i would then reply to that person directly and tell him/her to please not do that again and remind them of my message i had already sent out asking that they dont do that then i would be forced to remove them from my list
its good now all is quiet without the junk mail -- just the personal messages now -- no longer being flooded in junk mail at Tickle.com *relieved*
Yeah, I found your avatar. Be a good behave in tickle. com Steel !!
...*blowing my nose*.....