I like the way it is now here in Ca. It works so far .
Does that mean allowing texting while driving?
I like the way it is now here in Ca. It works so far .
I would rather a kid learn to drive under my supervision while in high school than to graduate high school and go to college while driving for the first time.I think the legal driving age should be 18. Teens are often inexperienced drivers, they go from being scared to being over confident in a very short amount of time which is dangerous.
I would allow my DD to get her learners at 14 and she can test for her drivers at 16, but she will have to drive with me and only me in the vehicle with her until she is 18. I will also require her to drive in all conditions before I turned her loose on her own. I don't want her running into a situation she's never been in before, freak out and have an accident. I think a four year restricted license would be ideal. It would keep the kids under the guidance of the parent until the child has driven in all sorts of situations and the parent guided them through it and the child gets a chance to go through the same situation again later, make their own decision about it under the supervision of the parent.
The kids just need more experience driving before being turned loose. I would be nice if I could have a car fitted with a device that allowed my DD's car to reach a maximum speed of only 65, if she goes over that, the car automatically shuts down and calls my mobile phone with her location, and a passcode only I know would be required to restart the car. Knowing that this device was on the car would deter her from driving recklessly.
Many well-to-do-parents outfit their kids cars with GPS devices that tracks their speed, where they went, how long they were there, whether or not the seatbelt was on and in some cases whether or not the stereo was turned on.
As for no hats and no sunglasses policy - that can be extremely hazardous in situations where you are driving into the sun and there is so much glare that you can't see the highway and the flip-down visor doesn't help. This is true for short people especially.
These drivers just need more training before they are released to a full license. Some states already have a graduated licensing system set up in such a way that the driver is 18 before they are released to an unrestricted license.
I would think the concern would be more toward prevention of teenaged accidents than how it affects businesses.
Why no sunglasses or hats?
Good question.
How do hats and sunglasses negatively interfere with one's ability to drive?
My daughters will not start driving until they are 17...at least. Period. They also will not be riding in cars driven by 17 year olds or younger. Period.
I agree! My daughter just turned 12 so I am just dreading the day she can start driving. It is approaching too fast! Now, I can understand how my mom must have felt when I went out driving with my friends at 16 years old. Scary!
Thanks to MTV, she has the belief that her mother will purchase a Mercedes Benz for her on her 16th birthday.
Reply: AllDeaf.com - View Single Post - Teenage driving and auto accidents at a glanceGood question.
How do hats and sunglasses negatively interfere with one's ability to drive?
Reply: AllDeaf.com - View Single Post - Teenage driving and auto accidents at a glancesilly argument - it causes limited visibility but they failed to take into account for sunny view and eye-blinding reflections
Why no sunglasses or hats?
Does that mean allowing texting while driving?