- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 143
alright then, how about if the law for excess speeding have changed drastically to say like, if caught for 160hm/r (100mph) risks a 10 years jail term, then a 90 Mph carries a risk of 7 years jail and a 80mph a 5...would this make you think twice about the fast bike you have and its potential to break 3x legal speed limits of 60mph? (180 mph is well within reach of your bike)...
now, its not like you're trying to kill someone, but potentially you could, (and a lot more easily than getting someone very stoned n marijuana but highly unlikely to get them overdosed on Marijuana (which is proven false, while alcohol can kill)... then the whole perception of whats fun and what dangerous and whats legal and not has become a matter of debate that is carried in a more fluid-civil way which the spectrum of opposites are 'tolerable' unlike debates for jail terms lengths for murder-manslaughter types of crimes....
im not sure what I am trying to ask but it's something like, a what-if question, in a slant where, suppose it so easy to point fingers at other people on matters unrelated to ourselves in a way we have nothing to do with it, but exercise veiled judgement or blind contempt, trained by society's "shared normative dogmatic values"....
like would it make you feel like a criminal, then again if that 'law' was like this in a parallel universe where dope is perceived a bit like how we think of alcohol now and that speeding is a VERY serious crime on the same level of murder, and say another parallel places might have had this law changes took place some 80 years ago while the rise of ashplat road and automobiles being manufactured during the better part of the 20th century......and in that parralel opium was never banned.....
I am asking a question of 'how we MIGHT understand these things would be different to how we *understood it now*
question everything!
the difference is..... he distributed the drugs. drug distribution in here carries with harsher penalty.