somedeafdudefromPNW
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 1
Wirelessly posted
Analysts, off the top of my head, says female-on-male rape is probably on the same level as male-on-female rape, but due to cultural expectations, they're never reported.
Anij said:Ok, she admitted she had intercourse with a teenager boy several times.
Let's see... that boy got a hard on and you think the teacher should be sentenced to 15 years?
An erection - especially in teenage boys is a physiological response, not an invite for sex.
Just because the boy got an erection (even if he was attracted to her) does NOT make it ok for an adult woman to presume that it's somehow "ok" to have sex with the minor because he's "aroused".
While much less common - it IS possible for a female to (for all intents and purposes) rape a male (especially a teen as they are prone to spontaneous erections) . To pressure another person into a sexual act, EVEN if the person is aroused is STILL rape.
People seem to conveniently forget that arousal isn't a sign of consent. Arousal is the body's response to hormones (spontaneous erection) and to specific types of physical touch - simple friction is often enough to provoke the body's response ... this does NOT make it ok.
If a woman obviously was being raped - but had specific physical responses due to the nature of what was being done (some of which in a women are to protect her from being injured during intercourse) ... would you say "see she __________ (insert one or more physical body responses that happen to females during sex) at some point during it ,so she asked for it" ???
Analysts, off the top of my head, says female-on-male rape is probably on the same level as male-on-female rape, but due to cultural expectations, they're never reported.