Start with spoken language or ASL?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anything can happen, just don't deny it. YOU LOVE ME. Hahahaha.


But RD, she didn't call you an idiot, but me. I was the one who was called an idiot for not researching anything and guessing a lot of things, haha.

The next time you decide to alter my words in any way, be prepared to be reported to the moderators.
 
So you admit that I never said you used the word idiot as you claimed. Now you tell me that I can't make assumptions. Sorry but the last time I checked I have freewill and control of my own mind. I can and will make assumptions. If you disagree then by all means correct me but don't accuse me of something I didn't do. Interjecting my interpretation onto your words?? Really?? What does that even mean? Onto your words???? Really?? Maybe I am an idiot.

Ouch, I have to say.


BURN



But she merely means stop making an ass out of yourself and "me".

when I said "me", I clearly don't mean ME.
 
So you admit that I never said you used the word idiot as you claimed. Now you tell me that I can't make assumptions. Sorry but the last time I checked I have freewill and control of my own mind. I can and will make assumptions. If you disagree then by all means correct me but don't accuse me of something I didn't do. Interjecting my interpretation onto your words?? Really?? What does that even mean? Onto your words???? Really?? Maybe I am an idiot.

I admit nothing of the sort. It is right there in your post # 320. I am the one who did not use the word. Yet you assumed, through your statement, that it is what I was thinking. Again, you are interjecting your own interpretation on my words.
 
The next time you decide to alter my words in any way, be prepared to be reported to the moderators.

NO LOVE!!

You're ruining it all!

Spread the love!


BTW, it's not the same one that banned me, is it?

Oh wait, I've been banned by 2 mods. GREAT.
 
So you admit that I never said you used the word idiot as you claimed. Now you tell me that I can't make assumptions. Sorry but the last time I checked I have freewill and control of my own mind. I can and will make assumptions. If you disagree then by all means correct me but don't accuse me of something I didn't do. Interjecting my interpretation onto your words?? Really?? What does that even mean? Onto your words???? Really?? Maybe I am an idiot.

idiot.... j/k. just my feeble attempt to lighten up this thread because it's getting hotter
knary.gif
 
I learned ASL first -- started at about 1 1/2 years old. Speech followed shortly thereafter. I continued with 15 years of speech therapy. I still have a deaf accent but it gets better all the time. Anyhow, I was very much a loner when growing up so all my spare time went into reading books. I was reading college-level books by age 10-12 or so .. I think all the reading I did is what has made my vocabulary and English be what it is today. So, I'm not sure how much of my English is attributed to learning sign first and developing good speech skills after, versus all the reading I did.

Alleycat - very good point there (in bold).
I was pretty much the same way as u (aside from the learning ASL part. i didn't take a class in ASL until college). i had my nose in books ALL the time and i do wonder if maybe that's a big reason why my vocabulary is at such a high level. perhaps it really is more of an individual thing.
I still have a deaf accent too, lol. we always will because our hearing will never be 100% even with a CI. unless perhaps sometime in the future technology has another break through. never know! :hmm:
 
idiot.... j/k. just my feeble attempt to lighten up this thread because it's getting hotter
knary.gif

Yeah. Lets go back a couple of pages to the post where I provided links and quotes regarding TC that I was asked for. Seems those were conveniently overlooked.
 
Alleycat - very good point there (in bold).
I was pretty much the same way as u (aside from the learning ASL part. i didn't take a class in ASL until college). i had my nose in books ALL the time and i do wonder if maybe that's a big reason why my vocabulary is at such a high level. perhaps it really is more of an individual thing.
I still have a deaf accent too, lol. we always will because our hearing will never be 100% even with a CI. unless perhaps sometime in the future technology has another break through. never know! :hmm:

it's still never going to be 100% unless there's a technology that can correct our "defective" hearing at DNA level.
 
Alleycat - very good point there (in bold).
I was pretty much the same way as u (aside from the learning ASL part. i didn't take a class in ASL until college). i had my nose in books ALL the time and i do wonder if maybe that's a big reason why my vocabulary is at such a high level. perhaps it really is more of an individual thing.
I still have a deaf accent too, lol. we always will because our hearing will never be 100% even with a CI. unless perhaps sometime in the future technology has another break through. never know! :hmm:

I never touched the books. I, instead of the books, joined discussion groups to make myself useful. To learn how to understand one other and how to speak loud and clearly. But you girls are right, Books are the methods to improve your English and your vocabulary, NO JILLIO, YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THIS. But for me, I used a different method, I had to repeatly use the vocab every day to jam it on my brain, better than post it on my forehead. Haha.
 
Yeah. Lets go back a couple of pages to the post where I provided links and quotes regarding TC that I was asked for. Seems those were conveniently overlooked.

I never overlook anything, but I do overestimate things.
 
I admit nothing of the sort. It is right there in your post # 320. I am the one who did not use the word. Yet you assumed, through your statement, that it is what I was thinking. Again, you are interjecting your own interpretation on my words.
I never said you used the word idiot anywhere which is what you claimed I did in post #320. Now you have backpeddled and said I made an assumption. I agree with that. I did make an assumption but nowhere did I ever say you used the word idiot. Me claiming that you said something and me making an assumption on your path of responses are two entirely different things. You stating that I said you used the word idiot is entirely incorrect regardless of weither you see it that way or not. If you now want to put a spin on it and call it an assumption, that I will agree with.

Again. apologies to Shel.
 
I never said you used the word idiot anywhere which is what you claimed I did in post #320. Now you have backpeddled and said I made an assumption. I agree with that. I did make an assumption but nowhere did I ever say you used the word idiot. Me claiming that you said something and me making an assumption on your path of responses are two entirely different things. You stating that I said you used the word idiot is entirely incorrect regardless of weither you refuse to see it or not. If you now want to put a spin on it and call it an assumption, that I will agree with.

I said you interjected your interpretation onto my words. Go back and read the posts. And interjecting your interpretation, and stating that I "must" think something that has not been stated is, indeed making an assumption. In order for you to have any substantiation for accusing me of thinking that you were an idiot, you would have to provide evidence that I had actually used that term in reference to you. That is why I asked you to show me where I had used the term. You could not show where I had, and therefore, your accusation of what I "must" be thinking is totally unfounded. Now do you get it?
 
I said you interjected your interpretation onto my words. Go back and read the posts. And interjecting your interpretation, and stating that I "must" think something that has not been stated is, indeed making an assumption. In order for you to have any substantiation for accusing me of thinking that you were an idiot, you would have to provide evidence that I had actually used that term in reference to you. That is why I asked you to show me where I had used the term. You could not show where I had, and therefore, your accusation of what I "must" be thinking is totally unfounded. Now do you get it?


One thing. You didn't think of those things. You researched them all. Typical, taking those credits as if it were your own.
 
I'm sorry....was someone talking to you? I must have missed that.

You spoke of "people" overlooking your links and quotes. I simply replied that I didn't, I just guessed too much. You spoke in GENERAL. Including me.
 
One thing. You didn't think of those things. You researched them all. Typical, taking those credits as if it were your own.

it is HER own conclusion that is substantiated by these findings.
 
You spoke of "people" overlooking your links and quotes. I simply replied that I didn't, I just guessed too much. You spoke in GENERAL. Including me.

I'm sorry....was someone talking to you? I must have missed that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top