That's a very good point. Keep in mind that the FCC requires VRS calls to be answered within a certain amount of time. So it's not just that deaf people want their calls to be answered fast...it's REQUIRED that they are answered fast. And almost everyone I know who uses VRS loves it, they don't want to give that up either.I can understand the argument about setting up call centers in Canada as Canadians cannot use the services when calling any country other than the USA...but one thing no one seems to be considering in all this-
Supply and Demand--
If Deaf people were not using VRS then Sorenson and the other companies would not be "taking" interpreters from the community. Obviously intepreters should have a balance...for the community as well as their own development...but interpreters are needed in VRS too--- Deaf people complain when their VRS interpreters take too long, but yet complain there aren't enough in the community, for current interpreters dodo?
Not when it is interfering with the deaf Canadians' rights to an interpreter in Canada.
I challenge you to come sit next to me for a day of work and then try to say that again.I don't like miscommunication with deaf people talking with the Sorenson.
Not deaf people are fault. Interpreters are fault!
I never tried a Video Relay Service before in my life. I thought they sometimes make miscommunicate with deaf people at the VRS.
That is both beautiful and sad. It makes me happy that she could finally communicate how she felt to her mom, but it makes me sad that for such a long time they could not communicate.I know of a situation where a woman had better conversations when using VRS than with TTY relay. It took more than 50 years for her to finally express concepts to her hearing mother, concepts she could not express in a language foreign to her. The first VRS call, for her, was very emotional.
CCfan said:I don't like miscommunication with deaf people talking with the Sorenson.
Not deaf people are fault. Interpreters are fault!
What an insult!!!!
I can only work 6 hrs/day when I am in VRS. I tried doing 8 when I started, and every night I would get home exhausted. I couldn't spend time with my wife because I was so tired. So I cut back to 6 hrs/day and I can handle that. I know terps who work VRS for 8 hrs/day and even more, but I cannot do it. I would make more money that way, but it's not worth missing time for family and hobbies. I agree, full-time VRS is extremely difficult.There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Sorenson consistently pays LESS THAN community/VR rates. You can get benefits if you are full-time. Not many people can handle full-time Video Relay interpreting, and that rate is even LESS because of the benefits. So, in essence, it's harder work, for much less pay.
There is a BIG difference between stable income and high income. The reason a lot of interpreters like VRS is because it guarantees them a certain number of hours per week. When I used to work freelance, I did a lot of educational interpreting, so during summer I made very little money. That is the nature of the job, sometimes you have a lot and sometimes you have nothing. So for VRS, it means you always know you will get paid every day, all year. (Many people also like having stable hours so they can spend time with kids, and a stable location to commute to so they don't have to drive all over town a lot.)In comparison to freelance interpreting, Sorenson, what little they pay (out of $6.50 a minute), is stable income.
That's what I hear from the locals.
I'm very confused why you posted that, jillio. Isn't is about making Sorenson VPs able to call other VRS providers and users of other VPs? That has been possible for at least a year and I think maybe even two years. Sorenson is no longer a closed network, has not been for a while. Was there another reason why you posted that? Maybe I missed something?
I'm very confused why you posted that, jillio. Isn't is about making Sorenson VPs able to call other VRS providers and users of other VPs? That has been possible for at least a year and I think maybe even two years. Sorenson is no longer a closed network, has not been for a while. Was there another reason why you posted that? Maybe I missed something?
Oh, well it is a pretty old link! I checked, Sorenson opened up in Feb. 2006!Passing on an email link I received from deafread yesterday.
I am just going to have to make a vlog about this...ha. Nice. I have been told the same thing he saying. Nobody listen to me and keep support Sorenson. I have to saying I'm glad someone make a better step than I do. *sign up*