Some People Just Can't Have a Life...

Status
Not open for further replies.
sillycat said:
Breastfeeding the baby by a different woman than the mother is done in tribal cultures but I have a hard time imaging any western culture woman doing that--especially in the US.

Heath, you may have to learn to be more flexible in certain situations within a marriage. Being a big boss in the marriage is not always going to work--I know what Im talking about from personal experience.

Exactly. Some women can't nurse, or a special circumstance arises, and bottle feeding becomes necessary.

It happened to my sister with her daughter. Nursing is a wonderful thing, but it's a woman's choice. It also isn't easy or always doable.

Face it. Some times, women need to bottle feed their children, and they don't need pressure from anyone to feed from the breast.
 
Heath said:
5 million babies are nutritionally deificient right now in the USA

And that is a problem, yes. I don't see the logical connection between "5 million babies are nutritionally deficient" and "Heath has absolute authority over the bodies of all 150 million American females". Care to explain this connection? It escapes me.

It's also worth noting that the reason many of those babies are nutritionally deficient is because their families are *poor*. What do you think breast milk gets made out of? Thin air?

Wrong. Breast milk is made out of the food the mother consumes. If the mother is starving and has no food to eat, she won't be producing any breast milk either. Infant malnutrition is a symptom of a larger problem: poverty. If we eliminate poverty, infant malnutrition would be a significantly mitigated problem.

Yes, breast milk is still healthier than formula (a detail I never denied). That does not change the fact that you do not have any authority over women and that if a woman chooses not to breast feed, it is her choice and you have to respect that. Similarly, if a woman chooses to breast feed, it is her choice and you have to respect that as well.

The uproar about the cover is nonsense, but so is the puritan hatred of sex that is prevalent in American society (particularly among conservatives).

Heath said:
yes women are to submit to the husbands as this is very wise and God fearing.

"Wise"? Opposition to freedom has a habit of losing... I wouldn't call consistent losses in every way "wise".

Heath said:
It says so right there in the Bible.

Not in my Bible...

Heath said:
you just said you support abortion in another thread then you said you would not get an abortion for yourself.

Again, it's my body, it's my choice one way or the other.

Heath said:
another 5 million dead babies thrown in the dumpster behind abortion clinics

If a doctor takes a throat culture from you because you have a sore throat, are the cells scraped off your throat a human? Are the cells that naturally are shed from your body every day each little itty bitty humans? No.

A handful of cells is not a human being.

Heath said:
Can you see the hand of satan at work in your life ?

I don't believe in the existence of a "satan" (at least not in the sense that you do). How can I see the work of something that doesn't exist? That's idiotic.

Heath said:
and you are :devil: and I am an :angel: and you really need to be an :angel: and many Christians are trying to help you also in love and support too.

My username is the name of one of the most heinous Biblical villians, but to say I am a devil would be to reject logic. How would you know if I were one or the other?

I don't have a problem with Christians who legitimately love and support me, such as my relatives. I do have a problem with Christians who do not legitimately support or love me (like you and some of the others on this forum) who believe that "love" includes the virtue of forcing a person to live, behave and think a certain way, reject logic and not be able to see how their actions affect other people. Love would accept people as they are... Sadly, your "love" does not, and is therefore a sad and depraved mockery of what love is.
 
Heath said:
women are to submit to the husbands

I feel sorry for your future wife, if you ever do get married.

If my boyfriend ever thinks I am to submit to him (if we get married) he can think again. I DO NOT SUBMIT TO ANYONE. I am my own person. All others can fuck off.
 
Regarding some comments that babies are malnourished, and therefore, breastfeeding is the best way to prevent malnutrition.

That's only the case if the mother is in good health. Many times, babies are malnourished because the Mother is unhealthy, and the baby isn't getting the nourishment from Mom that it needs. Therefore, sometimes it's better for both Mom and baby if baby is bottlefed.

Sometimes, circumstances arise and breastfeeding isn't the right thing for the baby. It goes back to it being an individual thing. What is right for one Mother may not be right for another.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
I feel sorry for your future wife, if you ever do get married.

She will not be sorry she married me. She would be greatly blessed by God and by me too. :angel:

If my boyfriend ever thinks I am to submit to him (if we get married) he can think again. I DO NOT SUBMIT TO ANYONE. I am my own person. All others can fuck off.

I can see this is the beginning of the end of your marriage. It is sad ..... No wonder many young people are getting divorced at a rapid pace meanwhile Christian couples are married for 50, 60, 80 or 100 years and they are greatly blessed by God.
 
Heath -

Some babies, due to certain medical problems, could not be breastfed and they have to be formula fed. Would you rather the babies died because you are so against formula? In some cases breastfeeding is *not* possible.

I was one of those babies.

So, fuck off.
 
Heath said:
I can see this is the beginning of the end of your marriage. It is sad ..... No wonder many young people are getting divorced at a rapid pace meanwhile Christian couples are married for 50, 60, 80 or 100 years and they are greatly blessed by God.

Hahaha, I'm not even married.

My boyfriend, thankfully, does not expect me to submit to him. We are equal and we are doing very well in our relationship.
 
Teresh said:
And that is a problem, yes. I don't see the logical connection between "5 million babies are nutritionally deficient" and "Heath has absolute authority over the bodies of all 150 million American females". Care to explain this connection? It escapes me.

It's also worth noting that the reason many of those babies are nutritionally deficient is because their families are *poor*. What do you think breast milk gets made out of? Thin air?

Wrong. Breast milk is made out of the food the mother consumes. If the mother is starving and has no food to eat, she won't be producing any breast milk either. Infant malnutrition is a symptom of a larger problem: poverty. If we eliminate poverty, infant malnutrition would be a significantly mitigated problem.

Yes, breast milk is still healthier than formula (a detail I never denied). That does not change the fact that you do not have any authority over women and that if a woman chooses not to breast feed, it is her choice and you have to respect that. Similarly, if a woman chooses to breast feed, it is her choice and you have to respect that as well.

The uproar about the cover is nonsense, but so is the puritan hatred of sex that is prevalent in American society (particularly among conservatives).



"Wise"? Opposition to freedom has a habit of losing... I wouldn't call consistent losses in every way "wise".



Not in my Bible...



Again, it's my body, it's my choice one way or the other.



If a doctor takes a throat culture from you because you have a sore throat, are the cells scraped off your throat a human? Are the cells that naturally are shed from your body every day each little itty bitty humans? No.

A handful of cells is not a human being.



I don't believe in the existence of a "satan" (at least not in the sense that you do). How can I see the work of something that doesn't exist? That's idiotic.



My username is the name of one of the most heinous Biblical villians, but to say I am a devil would be to reject logic. How would you know if I were one or the other?

I don't have a problem with Christians who legitimately love and support me, such as my relatives. I do have a problem with Christians who do not legitimately support or love me (like you and some of the others on this forum) who believe that "love" includes the virtue of forcing a person to live, behave and think a certain way, reject logic and not be able to see how their actions affect other people. Love would accept people as they are... Sadly, your "love" does not, and is therefore a sad and depraved mockery of what love is.

A TRUE CHRISTIAN WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTION, CHILD ABUSE NOR CHILD STARVATION NOR IGNORING THE WILL OF GOD AND THERE IS NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF ABOUT BEING A FEMINIST AND NOT WANTING TO BE WITH A MAN THE RIGHT WAY AS GOD INTENDED.

THOSE FAKE CHRISTIANS WILL TELL YOU YEA SUPPORT ABORTION , YEA SUPPORT GLBT YEA SUPPORT REBELLING AGAINST AUTHORITY YEA SUPPORTING MANY THINGS FORBIDDEN IN THE KJV HOLY BIBLE THAT IS THE WORD OF GOD !!!!! YOU ARE BEING MISLED BY FAKE CHRISTIANS.

REMEMBER THIS, A TRUE REAL CHRISTIAN WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTION, GLBT OR ANY OF THOSE DARK SATANIC THINGS AT ALL. A TRUE CHRISTIAN WILL OBEY THE WILL OF GOD !!!!!
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
Heath -

Some babies, due to certain medical problems, could not be breastfed and they have to be formula fed. Would you rather the babies died because you are so against formula? In some cases breastfeeding is *not* possible.

I was one of those babies.

So, fuck off.

So was I. So was my niece.

I don't understand why some people are so narrow minded as to reject this method of feeding. Breastfeeding is'nt only one way to nourish a child.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
Regarding some comments that babies are malnourished, and therefore, breastfeeding is the best way to prevent malnutrition.

That's only the case if the mother is in good health. Many times, babies are malnourished because the Mother is unhealthy, and the baby isn't getting the nourishment from Mom that it needs. Therefore, sometimes it's better for both Mom and baby if baby is bottlefed.

Sometimes, circumstances arise and breastfeeding isn't the right thing for the baby. It goes back to it being an individual thing. What is right for one Mother may not be right for another.

Of course, if the doctor says it would not be safe for my wife to breastfeed then that is fine. We will explore another options such as going to a professional breastfeeding clinic but I will not bottlefeed my children posion or any chemical based baby foods such as Gerber etc.
 
Heath said:
Of course, if the doctor says it would not be safe for my wife to breastfeed then that is fine. We will explore another options such as going to a professional breastfeeding clinic but I will not bottlefeed my children posion or any chemical based baby foods such as Gerber etc.


....No.

I could *not* have ANY breastmilk. Not even from another woman. I would die if I was *not* formula fed.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
....No.

I could *not* have ANY breastmilk. Not even from another woman. I would die if I was *not* formula fed.

Then my wife and I would follow the doctor's instructions to not breastfeed if you had a life threatening illness due to breastfeeding conditions. It is common sense.
 
Heath said:
Then my wife and I would follow the doctor's instructions to not breastfeed if you had a life threatening illness due to breastfeeding conditions. It is common sense.

You probably would let the baby die, since you are so against formula.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
....No.

I could *not* have ANY breastmilk. Not even from another woman. I would die if I was *not* formula fed.

True. I wonder how some people think a preemie is fed. They are usually tube fed through the umblical cord stump first, and then, through a tube in their nose until they can nipple feed FROM A BOTTLE. Until that time, they are fed formula through the tube until such time their digestive systems can handle milk.
 
Heath is fake christian.. fake Bible thumper... YOu expect all women would submit to you... ahhhhhhh no way.... i would not to you ass hole...
most of us women are on our own person... so BEAT IT!!
NO women will want you,,,, unless that woman is sooo dumb willing to submit to you.... would divorce you quickly sooner or later. when she gets smarter...
SxyPOrkie
 
moonflower said:
well i was bottled fed never beastfed

I was also bottle fed. My Mother was anorexic, and therefore, wasn't healthy enough to nurse.
 
yeah ocean

i was born in 70s that beastfeeding was not good idea to fed babies that what my mother told me *shrugs*
 
Heath said:
A TRUE CHRISTIAN WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTION, CHILD ABUSE NOR CHILD STARVATION

See the Wiki:No true Scotsman fallacy. That and I'm not a Christian, so your fallacy doesn't apply to me anyway.

Heath said:
NOR IGNORING THE WILL OF GOD

The "will of God" is something always up to interpretation because there are differing opinions as to exactly what that is. The fact that you do not understand this is evidence that you are not thinking clearly, not that you are correct.

Heath said:
AND THERE IS NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF ABOUT BEING A FEMINIST

I guess then that being patriotic and fighting for freedom isn't something to be proud of. I guess we should lock our founding fathers up for the rest of eternity too, as that's what they did.

Heath said:
AND NOT WANTING TO BE WITH A MAN THE RIGHT WAY AS GOD INTENDED.

Heath said:
THOSE FAKE CHRISTIANS WILL TELL YOU YEA SUPPORT ABORTION , YEA SUPPORT GLBT YEA SUPPORT REBELLING AGAINST AUTHORITY YEA SUPPORTING MANY THINGS FORBIDDEN IN THE KJV HOLY BIBLE THAT IS THE WORD OF GOD !!!!!

The KJV is a bad translation of the text. Why don't you start learning to read the text in its original languages rather than relying on the KJV translators' interpretation? It's funny, but your assertion that a translation is the literal word of God says how nonsensical your beliefs are. Your beliefs are not backed up by the actual text, so you have to rely on a bad translation rather than the original.

Hilarious.

Heath said:
YOU ARE BEING MISLED BY FAKE CHRISTIANS.

I'm not a Christian, so being "misled" by "fake Christians" is nonsense for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top