GoBack said:I use LSE (Lengua de Signos Española -> Spanish Sign Language)
I don't know ASL, I want learn it ,
but I never trip to USA... and I hope know NY
Regards
If you learn sign English first, it will be more difficult for you to "switch" to ASL later. For hearing people, it's better to learn ASL first. It's a little more difficult than SEE at first but it will be better for you in the long run. Otherwise, you will have to "unlearn" the signed English when you take up ASL, and it will be a more frustrating transition.Can I say, as a newb, I'm confused by everybody's responses? They are all over the map. So please allow me to ask a "dumb" question...
As a newb knowing the alphabet and a few signed words, how is best to proceed?
I have read where ASL is a language in its own due to syntax and grammar rules. I have read where SE/SEE is an "insult" to the deaf culture, PSE and MCE I don't know anything about.
Based on the poll results, I gather that pure ASL is preferred but should I start by learning something "easier" like SEE or is that the wrong approach.
TIA for helping me out on this! Dave
The simple answer is yes and from what I've read, I believe that I'm better off laying the foundation with ASL. I don't want to start with something that I will need to unlearn in the future. I also don't want to develop any shortcuts or bad habits with signing. As my hearing dimenishes, I will be relying on ASL for my life.Do you have opportunities to meet ASL signers?